🥶𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒋𝒖𝒍𝒚🥶 Спасибо моей маленькой Катюшечке за съёмку❤️ И вы только посмотрите на эти тучки 🎀🎀🐱
custom 525575440928293687110custom 53167015542862850057custom 52759861877381723723❤1🍓1

Channel
@lina_narl1n
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
87subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001807209890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lina_narl1n |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lina_narl1n |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:05 | 87 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 88 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 87 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 86 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 86 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
135 reactions across 8 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5348310108403156846 | 21 | 15.6% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5348546469043389925 | 12 | 8.89% | |
| custom 5316701554286285005 | 11 | 8.15% | |
| custom 5341460116602363355 | 11 | 8.15% | |
| custom 5255754409282936871 | 10 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5275986187738172372 | 10 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5348585566130682512 | 10 | 7.41% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 4.44% | |
| custom 5366208078939172142 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5330059100145328891 | 4 | 2.96% | |
| custom 5346172567604447008 | 4 | 2.96% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5352971475064205419 | 1 | 0.741% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥶𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒋𝒖𝒍𝒚🥶 Спасибо моей маленькой Катюшечке за съёмку❤️ И вы только посмотрите на эти тучки 🎀🎀🐱
custom 525575440928293687110custom 53167015542862850057custom 52759861877381723723❤1🍓1
👀👀👀
Ладно, фона на мэде не будет, есть у кого-то возможность сделать со мной парную партию? (Sunmi - Forever July)
❤4
💐Boompala💐 Просто вставлю сюда текст из моей приватки❤️ 🦋Бумпала Я очень кайфанула во время выступления, хотя танец сам по себе очень энергозатратный и на заявке я выглядела очень вяло, но на выступление всё получилось😶😶 Самое милое – выход наших друзей!! (пишу и плачу) Такая энергия была в этот момент, просто невероятно 👀👀Как все готовились выходить и вспоминали с какой руки начинать аххахаха, и киззята так ответст…
❤7custom 53414601166023633554💘3custom 53662080789391721422❤🔥1custom 53529714750642054191
ɴᴀʀʟɪɴ pinned a video
🧛 EXIST – Slay 🩵 – при участии narlin (2MOR), yankie (2MOR), vassi
❤4custom 53414601166023633553custom 53662080789391721423🔥2custom 53167015542862850051
Друзья, я вас люблю!!!❤️❤️❤️
custom 52759861877381723727🔥4custom 53414601166023633554❤3custom 53167015542862850053🍓1
1:55🤍
custom 53461725676044470083custom 53483101084031568462custom 53485855661306825121
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⬜ 𝐷𝑜 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑤𝑒'𝑙𝑙 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟? ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 𝐷𝑜 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑤𝑒'𝑙𝑙 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒? ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
custom 534831010840315684610custom 53485855661306825129custom 53485464690433899256❤🔥1custom 53461725676044470081
✨🌸
custom 53483101084031568469custom 53485464690433899256💘4custom 53300591001453288914
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lina_narl1n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ɴᴀʀʟɪɴ” (@lina_narl1n), 87 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lina_narl1n.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.