Channel
@limitrofff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
277subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001548415219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @limitrofff |
| Description | Уже не так активно стращаю менталитетом Цербер - https://t.me/fxxkyourself |
| Created | 2 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/limitrofff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 277 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 277 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (9 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 702 |
| Reactions total | 166 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
494 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 272 | 55.1% | |
| custom 5380044414867490931 | 73 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5440581313184696358 | 61 | 12.3% | |
| 🆒 | 28 | 5.67% | |
| 🕊 | 26 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5467539491461810616 | 23 | 4.66% | |
| 🥴 | 10 | 2.02% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.202% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Та самая штучка для тт😜 Долго думала, какое именно животное у меня с Марсом ассоциируется. Был вариант крот (эт больше я) и заяц, но улитка/слизень ему больше подходит. А Рин это корги, тут очевидно. У неё даже по лору есть корги, потом подробнее расскажу🤓 #видео
custom 53800444148674909318🆒4❤3custom 54405813131846963581custom 54675394914618106161
Достаточно старый тренд, но что-то захотелось сделать его с осами 🙏 Я щас люто вдохновлена и уже делаю штучку для тт #ос
❤11🥴5🆒1custom 54405813131846963581
Такая штука, просто, чтобы сложилась первое впечатление, глядя на них🌟🌟 Теперь окончательно уточнила их лица и черты. Из позитивного, у меня перестал так остро, как пару лет назад, ощущаться синдром одного лица. Но то, что один перс из арта в арт совершенно разный мы затрагивать не будем)) я просто экспериментирую. А вот канон Ринмарсы теперь такие. Эта штука как раз для будущей статьи. Её так-то надо до сентября сде…
custom 538004441486749093111❤6🆒2custom 54405813131846963581custom 54675394914618106161
Фото 3/4 анфас Всё, вспомнила, как каша дома пахнет) Уже даже придумала, как внедрить лор из вселенной выше в лор ринмарсов. Но это я ещё думаю, мб оставлю как самостоятельную вселенную. Я просто жесть как вдохновлена стеревом и это вдохновение волнами приходит, всё хочу сделать что-то в подобном вайбе и отвлечься от суровой атмосферы основного лора. А ещё, возможно, в скором времени я всё же сяду за статью (охх как…
❤15custom 53800444148674909314🕊2🆒2custom 54405813131846963581custom 54675394914618106161
Загадочни 😏 Напридумывала себе новую вселенную, вот развлекаюсь уже с неделю. Не думаю, что это надолго, просто отдыхаю от ринмарсов #ос
❤19custom 53800444148674909317🆒3custom 54405813131846963581custom 54675394914618106161
Непосредственно вот так 😁 За последние дни очень много рисовала, экспериментировала со стилем и с лором. Надо немного передохнуть от основной сюжетки, подумать о чем-то другом, но в творческом плане. Хочется чего-то свежего и нового, но моя фантазия весьма ограничена..( Быть может, в унике я наберусь опыта, новых впечатлений и знаний и тогда смогу выдать что-то достойное✍️ #ос
❤18custom 53800444148674909315custom 54675394914618106163🆒2custom 54405813131846963581
Гордость национальной сборной Ланциады 😱😳 Прошлое Адама изучено на 2%, там может быть всё, что угодно. Ну и я просто захотела нарисовать кого-то в спортивной форме)) К прошлогоднему темпу рисования я вряд-ли вернусь, но меня устраивает. Пусть не часто, но регулярно #ос
custom 538004441486749093112❤7custom 54405813131846963585custom 54675394914618106161
⭐️А вот и Рин⭐️ Впервые за долгое время работала в безлайне, хотя изначально план был другой хах #ос
❤18custom 53800444148674909317🆒2custom 54405813131846963582custom 54675394914618106161
Марсовость обыкновенный 🐱🐱🐱 Такой вот, на фоне флага Ланциады в кружевах. Лоб вытирает, быть может, устал от жары. Я хочу рисовать Рин, так как она одна из главных героев, но постоянно рисуется Марс, хз, как это фиксить( Надо больше рисовать так-то, но я щас параллельно учу новый язык, если это занятие станет чем-то серьёзным, то обязательно расскажу подробней ;) #ос
❤16custom 53800444148674909316custom 54405813131846963583🕊1🥴1custom 54675394914618106161
🧑🔧TW: кровь🧑🔧 Вот вам ещё Марс отдельно, я в восторге,очень нравится ) #ос
❤19custom 54675394914618106163custom 53800444148674909312
Две штуки из тик тока, которыми я очень горжусь 😞 Особенно первой, где Марс в форме. Обожаю тренды, через которые можно раскрыть своих осов, это прям отдушина #видео
❤14custom 54405813131846963586custom 54675394914618106162
Я к вам с хорошими новостями!🌟 Думаю, сейчас уже с бОльшей уверенностью можно говорить о поступлении в столицу, хотя, конечно, я не исключаю и других вариантов. А это значит, что впереди меня ждет этап глобальных перемен, я в предвкушении :) На следующей неделе официально выпускаюсь из школы, окончательно подходит к концу эта глава моей жизни. Но, как гласит песня: «И хотя нам прошлого немного жаль, лучшее, конечно,…
❤21🆒4custom 53800444148674909314custom 54405813131846963581
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @limitrofff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,035,532 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“лимитрōф ☮︎” (@limitrofff), 277 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/limitrofff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.