2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 16:31
86
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:32
86
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
14
Videos
1
Links
24
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
140 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
35
25.0%
🔥
29
20.7%
custom 6035025089261475932
28
20.0%
🤝
13
9.29%
custom 5323786382013910176
7
5.00%
custom 5765038179405011053
7
5.00%
custom 5323732475879380164
5
3.57%
custom 5240299398964977400
4
2.86%
😁
4
2.86%
custom 5828186005521307824
3
2.14%
custom 5235565997112433719
2
1.43%
custom 5345878005862380093
2
1.43%
custom 5235468355325926308
1
0.714%
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2025 to 24 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Большая Ретро Разблядовка
Решил подбить промежуточный итог по трём категориям проектов:
1. Отработанные, жду выход 🟢
2. В процессе отработки🟡
3. Позже решу делать ли или скип🔵
🟢:
- Hyperlane - слили сайт чекера, дроп видимо в апреле. Чёт необычное придумывают с бустом за холд/дальнейшее пользование протоколом. Посмотрим, сделал достаточно жирные акки по 30+ транз.
- Linea - снова перенесли дату выхода "до лучших к…
Пришло много новеньких в канал, после статьи Тимера. Подборка небольших авторских каналов по крипте, всем к прочтению - там же мини-интервью со мной)
»»»Читать«««
Всем рад, добро пожаловать🫡
Накидайте реакций, кто не просто добавил папку и реально будет читать канал, придумаю как-то интерактивчик для вас✍
Долгожданная статья перед вами👍
Вокруг инфо-шум, посты как под копирку. Мы тратим на них столько времени читая по сути одно и то же, не получая той самой gem-инфы
Факт:
Большие каналы имеющие тысячи подписчиков и охватов ≠ качество постов
Каналы с меньшей аудиторией могут быть намного более гемными. И количество подписчиков не на что не влияет в наше время и никогда не влияло. Есть просто те - кого не замечают. Ста…
50$ за 1 минуту, чё реально???😮
Самым быстрым и НЕ ЛЕНИВЫМ выпал шанс лутануть 50$ на суши и девочку. Учу самых маленьких абузить АМА-сессии))
Коротко, Incrypted проводит АМА-сессию с призовым пулом в 500$ (мы за ним пришли). Нужно придумать интересный вопрос и, если его зададут, вы получите 50$.
Что нужно:
1. Гугл акк
2. ТГ
3. Адрес кошелька EVM (можно депозитный адрес OKX или Binance)
Делаем:
1. Открываем форму
…
Горячий мексиканец аргентинец всех наебал..
Meteora
Скам $LIBRA привёл одному из худшего сантимента по солане за всю историю (пост). В историю с аргентинским токеном, по всей видимости, участвовал сооснователь Meteora Бен Чоу, который покинул свой пост на фоне всего скандала. В общем, судьба Meteora сейчас под большим вопросом, объемы в чейне практически нулевые - фармить очень сложно. Так что, пока отодвигаю Метеор…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @limitless_0x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2025 to 24 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“limitless” (@limitless_0x), 86 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/limitless_0x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
