НУ КАК ЖЕ ОНИ ХОРОШИ🫠
🔥13❤10🥰9

Channel
@limerenceflame
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
795subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001977802413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @limerenceflame |
| Created | 14 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/limerenceflame |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 795 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 796 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (21 April 2026 – 15 July 2026) |
| Views total | 183 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
337 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 157 | 46.6% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 16.9% | |
| 🥰 | 53 | 15.7% | |
| 😍 | 28 | 8.31% | |
| 🤯 | 22 | 6.53% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 2.37% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 1.78% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 1.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 337reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
НУ КАК ЖЕ ОНИ ХОРОШИ🫠
🔥13❤10🥰9
Красивый мужчина для увлажнения ваших губ😎 #принцардена
❤16💋6👍4
Video message, posted without a caption
😍8🔥6🥰5
🔮 Пᴏᴦᴩуɜиᴛᴇᴄь ʙ ᴀᴛʍᴏᴄɸᴇᴩу ᴧюбиʍых иᴄᴛᴏᴩий •Бᴀᴧьɜᴀʍ дᴧя ᴦуб «Thᴇ Viᴄiᴏus Kiss» — нᴇиɜʍᴇннᴀя ᴋᴧᴀᴄᴄиᴋᴀ ᴄ Тᴩиᴄᴛᴀнᴏʍ и Адᴇᴧинᴏй. Пᴏдᴀᴩиᴛ ʙᴀɯиʍ ᴦубᴀʍ ʍяᴦᴋᴏᴄᴛь и бᴇᴩᴇжный ухᴏд, нᴀᴨᴏʍинᴀя ᴏ ᴄᴀʍых чуʙᴄᴛʙᴇнных ʍᴏʍᴇнᴛᴀх иᴄᴛᴏᴩии. •Сʙᴇчᴀ «Рᴏᴋᴄᴀнᴀ» — нᴀᴨᴏᴧниᴛᴇ ᴋᴏʍнᴀᴛу чᴀᴩующиʍ ᴀᴩᴏʍᴀᴛᴏʍ цʙᴇᴛущᴇй ᴄиᴩᴇни. Её ʍяᴦᴋᴏᴇ ᴨᴧᴀʍя ᴄᴏɜдᴀᴄᴛ ᴛᴏᴛ ᴄᴀʍый уюᴛный и ɜᴀᴦᴀдᴏчный ᴨᴏᴧуʍᴩᴀᴋ дᴧя идᴇᴀᴧьнᴏᴦᴏ ʙᴇчᴇᴩнᴇᴦᴏ чᴛᴇния. •Тʙᴇᴩдыᴇ духи «Иɜᴀну Нᴀᴀᴩи» — ᴛᴇᴩ…
❤7🔥5🥰3
Уж очень просили что-то по «принцессе Ардена» сделать..ПРОЦЕСС ПОШЕЛ
❤18🔥9🥰7
#вашизаказы
❤17👍4
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰16❤14
Channel photo updated
Тʙᴏя ᴧюбиʍᴀя иᴄᴛᴏᴩия — ᴛᴇᴨᴇᴩь и нᴀ ϶ᴧᴇᴋᴛᴩᴏннᴏй ᴋниᴦᴇ! 📖✨ 🌟🌟🌟 Мᴇчᴛᴀᴧи, чᴛᴏбы ʙᴀɯ ᴩидᴇᴩ ʙыᴦᴧядᴇᴧ ᴋᴀᴋ ᴩᴏᴄᴋᴏɯный ᴋᴏᴧᴧᴇᴋциᴏнный ɸᴏᴧиᴀнᴛ? Тᴇᴨᴇᴩь ϶ᴛᴏ ᴩᴇᴀᴧьнᴏ. Я ɜᴀᴨуᴄᴋᴀю ʙ ᴨᴩᴏдᴀжу чᴇхᴧы нᴀ ϶ᴧᴇᴋᴛᴩᴏнныᴇ ᴋниᴦи ᴨᴏ индиʙидуᴀᴧьнᴏʍу ɜᴀᴋᴀɜу! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Кᴀᴋ ϶ᴛᴏ ᴩᴀбᴏᴛᴀᴇᴛ? Нᴀ ᴋᴀᴋую ʍᴏдᴇᴧь? Нᴀ ᴧюбую! Гᴧᴀʙнᴏᴇ уᴄᴧᴏʙиᴇ — нᴀᴧичиᴇ ʙ ᴨᴩᴏдᴀжᴇ ᴄиᴧиᴋᴏнᴏʙᴏᴦᴏ чᴇхᴧᴀ ᴨᴏд ʙᴀɯу ʍᴏдᴇᴧь (ᴏн ᴄᴛᴀнᴇᴛ ᴏᴄнᴏʙᴏй). Мᴀᴛᴇᴩиᴀᴧы: Тᴋᴀн…
❤13🔥11🥰6
Ой, не могу НАДО ПОКАЗАТЬ ВАМ это мой самый красивый чехол🫠 а что там на заднике будет….. #Гринч_творит #bookbinding
😍20🥰7🔥5❤3
Ребята, мне сообщили, что тут орудуют мошенники!!! я не пишу от имени магазина в лс У меня есть только один аккаунт @neverland_boo БУДЬТЕ БДИТЕЛЬНЫ, пожалуйста 🙏🏻
🤯22❤11
уже готовлю макет для следующего чехла 😎 на новой неделе расскажу поподробнее по заказам🧡
❤14🔥6🤩6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @limerenceflame. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Limerence Flame🫀| мастерская Гринча” (@limerenceflame), 795 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/limerenceflame.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.