2к🥳🥳
❤4custom 53530198965255036651
Signed shyne

Channel
@liltraphata
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
77subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002154470349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liltraphata |
| Description | боссы @liltrapshi @BEZSMERTNYYYY |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 16 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liltraphata |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 77 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 77 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 16 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
101 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 44.6% | |
| custom 5353019896525503665 | 32 | 31.7% | |
| custom 5404536513117562897 | 11 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5372886001465170842 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| custom 5276110277933288947 | 4 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5237854265493437417 | 3 | 2.97% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2024 to 28 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2к🥳🥳
❤4custom 53530198965255036651
Signed shyne
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed данёк бессмертный
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53530198965255036654custom 52378542654934374171custom 52761102779332889471
Signed shyne
Хит Фараона «Black Siemens» вышел ровно 10 лет назад. День, когда индустрия перевернулась 🔥 ❤️ — а@уеть я старый
❤5custom 52761102779332889473custom 52378542654934374172
Signed shyne
🎧 Платина дропнул «Опиаты круг» ровно 5 лет назад! Культовая работа Роберта, подарившая нам много хитов… и треков, разбивающих сердце. 🌟 — обожаю этот релиз 🌟 — не мой звук 🦎 Рифмы и Морген
custom 53530198965255036653❤2
Signed shyne
ну чет типа того)
custom 53530198965255036656❤2
Signed shyne
🌟 @liltraphata
❤6custom 53530198965255036651
Signed данёк 999
🤙
❤4custom 53728860014651708424
Signed данёк 999
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54045365131175628972
Signed данёк 999
шарит
custom 53530198965255036656❤2
Signed shyne
😍
❤6custom 53728860014651708421
Signed данёк 999
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53530198965255036657❤4custom 54045365131175628973
Signed shyne
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @liltraphata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@liltraphata named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“liltraphata” (@liltraphata), 77 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liltraphata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.