Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LililiAn🫧

@liliann7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003695301148
TypeChannel
Username@liliann7
DescriptionПочеркушки лилианнн для связи - @dlw7qrigs
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 29 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/liliann7

Growth

511 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers11 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:475no change
11 Aug 2026, 04:155first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 29 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
32
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2337.7%
custom 53125324123521867471016.4%
custom 5188424517675920879813.1%
custom 544989791329348984758.20%
custom 532343139008199727534.92%
custom 532578315955446434034.92%
34.92%
custom 523133794970187741123.28%
custom 532367199414992121123.28%
custom 542938510224315532923.28%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 21 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Feb 2026, 10:28 UTCviews —

LililiAn🫧 pinned «🆘🆘Ребята, произошла максимально неприятная ситуация. аккаунт, с которого я вела этот канал, взломали, поэтому я потеряла права на использование настроек. ничего не оставалось, кроме как создать канал, идентичный этому, поэтому прошу всех, кто за мной следит…»

20 Feb 2026, 10:28 UTC34 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🆘🆘Ребята, произошла максимально неприятная ситуация. аккаунт, с которого я вела этот канал, взломали, поэтому я потеряла права на использование настроек. ничего не оставалось, кроме как создать канал, идентичный этому, поэтому прошу всех, кто за мной следит, перейти туда 🙏🙏 этот удалю спустя некоторое время.

❤‍🔥2

14 Feb 2026, 13:19 UTC543 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В любви всегда есть немного безумия, но в безумии всегда есть немного разума.💋 #twoswansluvcllb

❤‍🔥4custom 51884245176759208794custom 53125324123521867473custom 54293851022431553292

13 Feb 2026, 21:05 UTC158 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

с днём всех влюбленных! фотограф - хона кокоми - аргон яэ мико - я🥺 неожиданно, помимо рисования, занимаюсь ещё и косплеем! это был мой первый опыт совместного фотоса, но не смотря на отмороженные пальцы и отвалившийся хвост, мне очень нравится нежная, холодная атмосфера, самое идеальное попадание, на мой взгляд, под этот праздник! 😊

3❤‍🔥3custom 53257831595544643403

10 Feb 2026, 11:16 UTC71 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

в связи с последними обстоятельствами на счёт торможения телеграма, напоминаю, что у меня есть другие сот сети! дабы избежать перспективы общения через посыльных или сов как в Гарри Поттере, с радостью буду поддерживать связь и там!

❤‍🔥4

9 Feb 2026, 09:20 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @ueouu_uuPhoto

❀❀ .・゜゜・✧༺🤍༻✧.・゜゜・❀❀ Весенняя палитра 5 палитр | 25 участников Организаторы: @MiyanaNotFunny @brendalarts @bisabidesu @miayoshi_magiya_art @ueouu_uu Суть ивента: Участники испытывают себя, рисуя арт в ограниченной палитре, не прибегая к использованию цветов, которых нет в палитре. Сезон палитры весна, значит рисунок должен чем-то отсылать к весенней атмосфере, либо просто не отсылать к иным

❤‍🔥2

8 Feb 2026, 15:46 UTC55 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Чето будет

custom 54498979132934898475

8 Feb 2026, 10:53 UTC375 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Не могли пройти мимо нового тренда, поэтому встречайте моего Шрека... в коллабе с милой Трыней!

❤‍🔥3custom 53125324123521867473

5 Feb 2026, 11:23 UTC169 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

залью сюда ещё пару работ с календаря, шибко нравятся мне 🤏

custom 53234313900819972753❤‍🔥2custom 52313379497018774112

4 Feb 2026, 19:50 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

лысик в процессе 🙂

custom 53125324123521867474❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @liliann7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,188,199 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LililiAn🫧” (@liliann7), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liliann7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.