LilBabyGems pinned «$SKI 15k to 365M 24000X from call🪖»

Channel
LilBabyGems
@lilbabygems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
63subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002073413139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lilbabygems |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lilbabygems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 63 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 64 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 64 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 65 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
$SKI 15k to 365M 24000X from call🪖
SKI MASK DOG Buy! 🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶 💵 6.342 ETH ($24497.42) 🪙 67,228 SKI 🪙 0x3fc9…7fad | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $364,379,452 📊 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔵 Trending
LilBabyGems pinned «$SKI 15k to 135M 9000X from call🔼»
$SKI 15k to 135M 9000X from call🔼
This is Crazy!
SKI MASK DOG Buy! 🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮🦮 💵 2.978 ETH ($10918.22) 🪙 81,233 SKI 🪙 0x11dd…e854 | Txn 🔼 Position +1000% 🔼 Market Cap $135,028,775 📊 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔵 Trending
YUGLLIHC Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 Spent $236.96 (1 SOL) 🔀 Got 574,223 YUGLLIHC 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 💸 Market Cap $412,662 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending ⏺ #9 On SOL Trending 🔥
$YUGLLIHC 853Ws15JMSYvBz6oLbhH8hA4gMjrTEFXT1ATvHrJpump 300k Gamble here @YugllihcSolana
The Protocol Buy! 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 💵 0.50 ETH ($1649.93) 🪙 36,574,750 THE 🔷 0xd811…2210 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $480,389 📊 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔹 Trending
The Protocol Buy! 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 🔀 Spent $652.26 (0.198 ETH) 🔀 Got 18,814,427 THE 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 💸 Market Cap $356,084 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
220 K aped here
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lilbabygems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lilbabygems named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LilBabyGems” (@lilbabygems), 63 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lilbabygems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.