Channel
@lilac_log
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
292subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003848190667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lilac_log |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 20 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lilac_log |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 292 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 293 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:48 | 290 | +22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 268 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 272 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 272 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
914 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👾 | 914 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 914 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❗️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Дорогие подписчики! В этом сезоне Lilac планировалось 10 частей, и как раз в это время они должны были уже выйти. К сожалению, как вы и сами видите, вышли всего 8. Это связанно с тем, что у автора (т.е меня) с начала лета стартанули проблемы почти во всех аспектах жизни 🥹 В таком состоянии очень тяжело делать что-то серьёзное 🤩 Проект Lilac не закрывается, но будет продолжен как только …
👾52
🆕🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 8️⃣ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Кажется, осталось слишком много доказательств того, что ночью тут что-то произошло. ✨читать✨
👾42
🆕🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 7️⃣ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 А̷̙̭̂̐т̴͈͝м̶̯͚̮̈́̑͘о̴͔̓̈́с̴̝͑̒͋ф̷͔͓̍̕е̵̠̅̇ͅр̴͖̖͐а̴̖͈̬̽́͠ ⚠️[ SYS.LOG_██.Δ ]⚠️ ➡️perception integrity: failing ➡️anchor status: unstable?̴̟͔̮̝͓̒͘?̶̮̜̐̓̋̋͜?̸̻̮̏̑ ➡️reality check: ████████..... ̷t̷h̷e̷r̷e̷ ̷i̷s̷ ̷n̷o̷ ̷a̷p̷a̷r̷t̷m̷e̷n̷t̷ ̴y̴o̴u̴ ̴a̴r̴e̴ ̴s̴t̴i̴l̴l̴ ̴b̴l̴e̴e̴d̴i̴n̴g̴ 🔠читать🔠
👾48
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 6️⃣ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 атмосфера Он не хотел снова в это лезть. Но она уже лежала у него на полу. Живая. Или не совсем. 🔠читать🔠
👾40
⚠️[SYS.LOG_██]⚠️ ▶️signal artifact detected ➡️spectrum deviation: +17% ➡️dominant band: lilac ➡️classification: not in registry
👾36
Он почти уснул. Почти. Но воздух в комнате стал плотнее. Душно. Как перед грозой. Только гроза в этот раз шла изнутри. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
👾39
🔤🆕🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 5️⃣ 🌟[ LILAC.L̷O̷G̴_██.Δ ]🌟 // DO NOT LOOK // DO NOT L̶I̴E̶ 🔠🔠 DO NOT LO̷O0K̵ ➡️status: e̴r̶r̴o̷r̷ ➡️anchor: locked.... .....anch0r: lo̷s̴t̶ .....4nchor: lo̷c̴k̶e̴d̵ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➡️ h3_a1r34dy_s4w_y0u «только не т̶—█
👾54
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Когда сознание разваливается — остаётся только то, что застряло глубже остального. Он не должен был там быть.
👾42
[LOG_240656] ➡️структура расх̷о̶д̴и̵т̶с̷я̸
👾45
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 4️⃣ Этим вечером в местной прачке было неспокойно. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 [OBS//ANCHOR] ➡️Якорь █████ зафиксирован. ➡️Стабильность якоря превышает расчётную норму. ➡️Причина: неизвестна.
👾57
Если долго стоять рядом с работающей стиральной машиной и слушать, начинает казаться, что она слушает в ответ.
👾50
[ERR] Идентификация субъекта █████ невозможна. Причина: отсутствует в базе.
👾45
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lilac_log. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LILAC 16+” (@lilac_log), 292 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lilac_log.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.