Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🪫 like a jester

@like_a_jest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003810603673
TypeChannel
Username@like_a_jest
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 25 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/like_a_jest

Growth

748 Aug 2026, 15:30 — 74 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 22:01 — 74 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:309 Aug 2026, 22:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:0174no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:3074first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
124.3%
avg views ÷ 74 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.0
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (25 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total460
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
56
Videos
1
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53638339326871067088487.5%
1212.5%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC31 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀ глава по алнст готова, но требует вычитки; так что в ближайшие пару деньков я её внимательно просмотрю, отредактирую — и выложу. а дальше хочу сосредоточиться на бинцю. 😌 ⠀⠀ а пока я ещё в работе — глядите, чево рисовала. пони для дорогого сердцу друга и просто лёгкие рисовашки по иб. ⠀⠀ стараюсь сейчас больше рисовать — хочется всё же повысить скилл. 🤗 ⠀⠀ 🤍 #арт; #хэд

custom 53638339326871067087

27 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC226 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⠀⠀ ...а ещё реддлу одиннадцать. и у реддла нет игрушек. по крайней мере, нет своих. ⠀⠀ может быть, если бы он был сильнее, этого бы не случилось. может быть, если бы он был умнее, этого бы не случилось. может быть, будь он чистокровным, не как все эти дети с не-волшебниками в родственниках, а как те, которые так гордились чистотой крови, — этого бы не случилось. ⠀⠀ том реддл — слабый человек. тому реддлу, как мальчиш

custom 53638339326871067089

26 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC70 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀ — я хочу хиппи и панка вместе 😭 ⠀⠀ — щас будет. ты какую одёжку на хиппи хочешь видеть? ⠀⠀ мини-подарочек для моей чудесной приятельницы, который я нарисовала, пока смотрела фильм с любимой. 😌 делюсь с разрешения, ужасно довольна результатом 🤩 ⠀⠀ 🌟 #арт

custom 536383393268710670813

26 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC60 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀ сегодня засяду за алнст, ⠀⠀ а пока занимаюсь с ней — покажу вам пикчи дракончиков, которых рисовала для души. не знаю, буду ли что-то доводить до совсем ума, но мне нравится то, что вышло. 😌 ⠀⠀ нежно напомню также, что если вдруг вам хочется меня поддержать — я беру заказы, если вам желается что-то от меня увидеть лично; тем более, что сейчас, пока я в поиске работы, я была бы особенно рада этой поддержке. ⠀⠀ ушла

custom 536383393268710670811

22 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC73 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀ пока я, наконец, завершаю борьбу с отвратительной бессонницей (больше месяца сна по дай боже 4-5 часов с постепенно совершенно отключающимся мозгом и ещё месяц до этого просто абсолютно отвратительного сна — ивент весьма хардкорный, никому не советую проходить), хочу показать вам #арт-заказ, который наконец завершила в последние дни вместе с маленькой плюшкой в подарок заказчице. 🤩 ⠀⠀ как только восстановлюсь и за

custom 53638339326871067089

9 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC98 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⠀⠀ в какой-то момент приняла решение, что лайф-канал хочу сделать открытым. в конце концов, я не ощущаю, что пишу там что-то уж такое супер-секретное, так почему бы ему и не быть открытым? ⠀⠀ а потому — добро пожаловать на другую сторону рая. я поменяю ссылочку в навигации, а пока не сделала этого — сообщаю отдельным постом. 😌

custom 53638339326871067086

7 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC93 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⠀⠀ как быстро бежит время, ⠀⠀ и как же я давно не трогала эту ау. ⠀⠀ что ж, надеюсь, она стала только лучше за то время, пока я отсутствовала в ней. 😌

custom 53638339326871067087

7 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⠀⠀ исполнившееся желание вернуться, ⠀⠀ XIII. [бинхэ] союз бессмертных ⠀⠀ телеграф || фикбук ⠀⠀ и прикосновения, прикосновения, прикосновения, внимательные взгляды и бесконечные заискивающие и ласковые слова. разумеется, забота других ло бинхэ была приятна. ⠀⠀ и всё же… порой она была в тягость. ⠀⠀ 🌸 #хэд; #система

custom 53638339326871067087

6 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC100 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⠀⠀ в комментариях под постом скину строчки песен, которые меня сильнее всего вдохновили. 😌 ⠀⠀ пока что с драбблами всё, вернусь к впроцессникам. иногда отвлекаться приятно, но всё же работы хочется закончить. ⠀⠀ а ещё я поставила новую реакцию. потыкайте, мне будет приятно. 🤗

custom 53638339326871067088

6 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC94 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⠀⠀ memento mori, ⠀⠀ бифлифы (хэ сюань/ши цинсюань). расставание, модерн-ау, сонгфик, галлюцинации. ⠀⠀ телеграф: [1], [2] || фикбук ⠀⠀ и у него всё вышло. у него всё получилось. он даже перевыполнил свой план — до такого, как сейчас, он доводить не собирался; так почему на душе так блядски паршиво? почему так гадко? почему так мерзко? почему кажется, что что-то пошло не так? ⠀⠀ вся еда ему теперь кажется горькой. стак

custom 53638339326871067087

27 Jun 2026, 17:27 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⠀⠀ ...а там впереди огоньки маячат бифлифы и бинцю. 😌

4

27 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC101 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⠀⠀ capre diem, ⠀⠀ родительские чувства, пропущенная сцена. капитано, заботящийся об оророне и воспринимающий его едва оперившимся птенцом. ⠀⠀ телеграф || фикбук ⠀⠀ капитано жить, вообще-то, не собирается. капитано долг вообще-то свой в натлане выполняет — но что поделать, если упёртый мальчишка увязался за ним. //не пэйринг; наставническо-родительские взаимоотношения. ⠀⠀ 🌙 #хэд

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @like_a_jest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 369,972 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🪫 like a jester” (@like_a_jest), 74 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/like_a_jest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.