Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Design by Khomyak 📸

Channel

Design by Khomyak 📸

@likahomru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

176subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001624800759
TypeChannel
Username@likahomru
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/likahomru

Growth

1741761757 August 2026 — 175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 175 subscribers24 August 2026 — 174 subscribers31 August 2026 — 176 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 24 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 174–176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 06:05176+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:43174-1
8 Aug 2026, 14:01175no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:45175first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53437217518911580762926.9%
custom 54520794517371739782725.0%
custom 53777198883725794962422.2%
custom 53032817958259391751715.7%
custom 530319255499546042043.70%
custom 529209697513768632032.78%
custom 529851649525129861332.78%
custom 528498403255414208410.926%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC79 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рабочие будни🤩 отмените подъемы в 6 пж 🙏

custom 545207945173717397810custom 53437217518911580762custom 52985164952512986131

Signed Lika

1 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC167 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Tallinn 🇪🇪🍲🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 530328179582593917510custom 53777198883725794969custom 53437217518911580768custom 52985164952512986132custom 53031925549954604201

Signed Lika

31 Jul 2026, 00:18 UTC147 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 534372175189115807611custom 53777198883725794967custom 53032817958259391755custom 53031925549954604201custom 54520794517371739781

Signed Lika

30 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC133 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Stockholm ❤️🇸🇪

custom 545207945173717397816custom 53437217518911580768custom 53777198883725794968custom 52920969751376863203custom 53031925549954604202custom 53032817958259391752custom 52849840325541420841

Signed Lika

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @likahomru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Design by Khomyak 📸” (@likahomru), 176 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/likahomru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.