Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Hybrid | Лотерея

@lihybrid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001708223326
TypeChannel
Username@lihybrid
Description-ˋˏ ༻❁༺ ˎˊ- Вся важная информация есть в закрепе лс: @vivili66 -ˋˏ ༻❁༺ ˎˊ-
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/lihybrid

Growth

818281.57 August 2026 — 81 subscribers8 August 2026 — 82 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:1682no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:0482+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:0181first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.6%
avg views ÷ 82 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.9
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (31 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total594
Reactions total139
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,030
Videos
2
Links
128

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54315272859015074553726.6%
custom 49676938862028410672115.1%
custom 49697991846820596632014.4%
custom 54295699576355711381611.5%
custom 53078321289924563671510.8%
custom 54292846730228703751510.8%
custom 5472043782578912524117.91%
custom 524447885311555707521.44%
custom 524714817099506052521.44%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC8 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Делается ещё мини комикс

custom 54292846730228703753custom 54315272859015074551

8 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC20 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Захотелось изобразить появление в водах начала изобразить в виде перевоплощения девочки-волшебницы

custom 54315272859015074555custom 54292846730228703753custom 54295699576355711382

7 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC24 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ты решила сделать выбор в мою пользу. Я сделаю всё ,что бы ты не пожалела об этом 💋

custom 49676938862028410674custom 49697991846820596633

7 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC24 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pearlshine_artPhoto

Моя пикми розови часть трейда для @lihybrid

custom 54315272859015074556

6 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC29 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Арка начала Эта локация в мире моих персонажей служила дверью в небесный мир для душ людей после их смерти пока арка была целой, но после её разрушения души начали появляться в водах вокруг сооружения Лор дроп 💜

custom 54295699576355711384custom 54315272859015074554

5 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC32 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👁️ "И как сюда попала ты?"

custom 54315272859015074555custom 54295699576355711384custom 49676938862028410673

5 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC29 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Решила наложить цвета через режимы наложения поверх чб работы, сам процесс был интересен

custom 49697991846820596637custom 54720437825789125244custom 53078321289924563673

4 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC36 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Давайте попробуем 🤩

custom 54292846730228703752custom 54315272859015074552custom 49697991846820596631custom 54295699576355711381

4 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC68 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Трейд с https://t.me/pearlshine_art

custom 54315272859015074557custom 54292846730228703754custom 54295699576355711384

3 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC37 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Випка, посмотрим что из этого выйдет

custom 53078321289924563674custom 49697991846820596633custom 54720437825789125243

3 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sosya41424Photo

ХУМАНИЗАЦИЯ ПО ЭМОДЗИ!!!^^) 😭😍😂😳😋 Пока я нахожусь в мини отпуске от рисования запускаю интерактив который перейдёт в ролик на ютуб. Так что у вас есть шанс поучаствовать в этом процессе:3 Если рубрика зайдёт то возможно будет периодически проходить. Правила для того ,чтобы участвовать и повысить шанс быть выбранным для ролика надо: Быть подписанным на мой тгк , Репоснуть пост в свой тгк или 3 пиар

custom 49697991846820596631

3 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fictedlyPhoto

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ до 10.08.2026 (включительно) DTIYS – (Draw This In Your Style) нарисуй в своём стиле 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Правила: Сохранить задумку, позу и дизайн персонажа. Менять ракурс, освещение, цветовую гамму (в том числе рисовать в ч/б) можно! В комментариях оставлю несколько артов в качестве дополнительных референсов и укажу, на что обратить внимание в дизайне. Очень рекомендую ознакомиться. 🤩Условия: 1. Подписка на @fict

custom 54292846730228703751

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lihybrid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 206,848 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hybrid | Лотерея” (@lihybrid), 82 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lihybrid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.