RT @ltshijie: 盡管被譽為「爛尾大師」,習主席只對一件事不依不饒;鍾南山又預告六種新產品,疫情被留住了;中共為何找茬馮德萊恩? https://t.co/C83KSQrmbh
Channel
LIFETIME视界(非官方)
@lifetimecn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
979subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001246698775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lifetimecn |
| Description | 独立中国问题和美中关系研究。 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lifetimecn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 979 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 979 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- ≈16,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
盡管被譽為「爛尾大師」,習主席只對一件事不依不饒;鍾南山又預告六種新產品,疫情被留住了;中共為何找茬馮德萊恩? https://t.co/C83KSQrmbh
RT @ltshijie: 習近平的另類報復手段;中共轟轟烈烈通報長沙倒房事件,但迴避了一個重大事實;俄羅斯是否真佔領巴赫姆特? https://t.co/QAdaHNsDDh
習近平的另類報復手段;中共轟轟烈烈通報長沙倒房事件,但迴避了一個重大事實;俄羅斯是否真佔領巴赫姆特? https://t.co/QAdaHNsDDh
https://t.co/zTPFYe29WF
RT @ltshijie: 有好戲看,習近平乘亂對普京起了「歹意」;依中共的觀點,岳飛也成了「小流氓」?華爾街大投行開始直面在華業務的嚴峻現實,暴利夢想已經遙不可及。 https://t.co/GjWIOUH1jP
https://t.co/zSg4HFgIqm
「能打勝仗,作風優良」也應該掛在中國外交部大門口。習主席這句語錄可能是2023年中國最有味道的梗。 https://t.co/FbH74NyNao
彭博社報導,華爾街各大投行紛紛降低他們在中國的期望值。只有習近平能把他們揍醒,這對美國也許是一件好事。 https://t.co/qrIaNJDLVE
@globalfooting 這是一個西方心照不宣的問題。有點複雜。
有好戲看,習近平乘亂對普京起了「歹意」;依中共的觀點,岳飛也成了「小流氓」?華爾街大投行開始直面在華業務的嚴峻現實,暴利夢想已經遙不可及。 https://t.co/GjWIOUH1jP
無數事實證明,習近平與美國是一夥的。最新證據是,美國抓僑領,習近平立即跟風抓在美國僑領。 https://t.co/pwZNMF87ne
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lifetimecn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 855,850 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lifetimecn named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LIFETIME视界(非官方)” (@lifetimecn), 979 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifetimecn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.