Channel
@lifeintimidatesart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
225subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002005597088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lifeintimidatesart |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lifeintimidatesart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 225 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 226 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 226 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (12 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 399 |
| Reactions total | 72 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
202 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5382285030586357533 | 48 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5451959029444149787 | 34 | 16.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 32 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5400195190239565974 | 22 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5251718866601548994 | 20 | 9.90% | |
| custom 5280671550381518570 | 15 | 7.43% | |
| custom 5379810609732819939 | 11 | 5.45% | |
| custom 5379818065796046355 | 10 | 4.95% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 3.47% | |
| custom 5370718954241148131 | 3 | 1.49% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нашла прелестное книжное бинго, которого постараюсь придерживаться до конца года (интересно, сколько пунктов получится вычеркнуть…). А в книжном клубе Маши мы сегодня закончили обсуждать «Бабушка сказала сидеть тихо» Настасьи Реньжиной, но впечатления такие, что даже не хочется их нести в публичное поле 👹 Пишите, если у вас есть рекомендации по пунктам в карточке!❤️📚
custom 53822850305863575338custom 52517188666015489943❤🔥2
надо ли говорить, что это одна из моих любимейших литературных цитат ever… 🕊️🩻
custom 545195902944414978714🕊4
Видимо, когда начинаешь писать на английском языке, твоей английской языковой личности нужно проделать тот же творческий путь, который ты уже прошла на русском… В моих стихах на русском долгое время существовал… штамп? самоповтор?… про рёбра. В любой ситуации, где мне нужно было добавить драмы и напряжения, в строчках вылезали рёбра: то их что-то вскрывает, то сжимает, то что-то ещё — а как иначе читатель поймёт, чт…
custom 528067155038151857015❤🔥2
Извините, что ничего не пощу — кормлю белок и бурундуков в Сибири 🐿️⛰️
❤🔥21🕊3
life intimidates art pinned a photo
Важный нюанс: само мероприятие бесплатное, но зато вход на территорию «Сообщества» стоит 300 рублей 🥲
Петербург, какие планы на пятницу? Зову вас в Новую Голландию 17 июля в 19:00 послушать участников поэтического семинара, среди которых буду и я ☕️🕰️
custom 54001951902395659748
17 июля в 19:00 в «Сообществе» состоятся отчетные чтения поэтического семинара, стартовавшего в Новой Голландии в феврале 2026. Среди участников — поэты и авторы экспериментальной малой прозы из Москвы, Петербурга и других городов. Ведущая — Александра Цибуля. Свои тексты прочтут: Наталия Алексеева Андрей Арсентьев Лада Баричева Андрей Беляев Валерия Гусева Ася Завьялова Егор Киргизов Алиса-Мишель Лисенкова (заочны…
custom 53822850305863575335
Тейлор Свифт надо было выйти замуж, чтобы я сообразила, наконец, что происходит в песне Lover в строчке: My heart’s been borrowed and yours has been blue Это она не запихнула сюда рандомный набор образов, а обыграла стишок из англоязычного культурного кода. Там перечислены вещи, которые невесте нужно надеть на свадьбу, чтобы брак был счастливым: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue (опц…
custom 538228503058635753314❤🔥5custom 52517188666015489942
📖 что я читала на сабстаке на этой неделе: 💌 fantasy writers are weird about Ireland о небрежности авторов в придумывании фэнтези-миров и о том, как она влияет на репрезентацию ирландской культуры; 💌 what sells more books: publicity or content? грустный, но очевидный reality check для всех, кто хотел бы издать свою книгу; 💌 you want to be special, but you’re just average для перфекционистов, которым во всём надо …
custom 540019519023956597414custom 53707189542411481313custom 53822850305863575333
если меня спросят, почему я люблю поэзию, я скажу, что в 1923 году Уильям Карлос Уильямс написал стихотворение про красную садовую тачку, а почти ровно сто лет спустя, в 2020, ему ответила Мэри Руфл. please have a look, this is hilarious 🐥
custom 53822850305863575339custom 54519590294441497875custom 53798106097328199393
🏷️ Ещё одна книга, в которой ни один из главных героев не вызывает искренней симпатии. Мы предельно близко рассматриваем инфантильность, избалованность, эгоизм, вседозволенность, может быть, даже манию величия, и то, как эти качества перемешаны в людях. 🏷️ Мне понравились рассуждения о судьбе женщины в обществе — очень напомнило начало «Второго пола» Симоны де Бовуар, где многие социальные факторы рассматриваются че…
custom 54519590294441497878custom 53822850305863575331
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lifeintimidatesart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,018,739 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“life intimidates art” (@lifeintimidatesart), 225 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifeintimidatesart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.