Channel
@life_steps398
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
526subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001943997160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @life_steps398 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/life_steps398 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 526 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 527 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 528 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 11 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
366 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 179 | 48.9% | |
| custom 5316994904847560645 | 86 | 23.5% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 9.29% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 5.74% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5379895190523757595 | 10 | 2.73% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 1.91% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 1.64% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 1.09% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.273% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @life_steps398. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 August 2025 to 24 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Несколько недель назад начался 6-й семестр в Сколково Этот семестр называется "Предпринимательский" из-за обилия курсов, направленных на создание и изучение инноваций, а так же из-за (уже успевшего стать легендарным) стартап-модуля 🤟 Именно в параллели с этим модулем, мы в ближайшие 2 месяца будем запускать собственные стартапы, тестировать десятки гипотез, сводить юнит-экономику (когда-нибудь то она точно сойдется…
❤15🔥6💯4
Плюсы и минусы GTD В дополнении скажу о плюсах и минусах, чтобы было более четко понятны ограничения применимости ➕ Основные плюсы: 1. Подходит для параллельной работы над тучей проектов: система устроена так, что большое количество направлений работы никак не мешает функционированию 2. Подходит для асинхронных проектов: когда требуется взаимодействие с другими людьми или ожидание событий 3. Подходит для работы вм…
❤12custom 53169949048475606457🔥4❤🔥2
GTD Я раньше писал про систему эффективности, которой придерживался более 250 дней. Кстати поделитесь, кто пытался внедрить себе, и какие у вас результаты 👀 Однако для формата работы, который есть сейчас в моей жизни, эта система подходит плохо, поэтому долгое время искал замену, и, как вы уже поняли, нашел достойную и работаю по ней более 2 месяцев GTD или Getting Things Done решает ключевую проблему потери энерг…
❤13❤🔥6custom 53169949048475606455
Профиль обновил, 2026 начался А, да, прошло уже 1.5 месяца 🕔 Последние несколько месяцев — внутренняя пересборка, новые направления, приоритеты, системы. А теперь восстаю из пепла, загораюсь и зажигаю всех остальных 🔥 Контента много есть и будет С чего начнем? Новый ключевой проект — образовательная настольная карточная игра 🎲 Это звучит совершенно неожиданно, но это так. Предмет "Проектный менеджмент" на 3 курс…
❤🔥12❤6custom 53169949048475606456👍1
Всем привет! Я студент 3 курса бизнес-бакалавриата МФТИ🍏 и СКОЛКОВО🍎 Самое важное обо мне: — Поступил по БВИ — Учусь бесплатно — выиграл грант на 8 миллионов рублей — Более 6 лет занимался олимпиадной физикой — Работал PM в топ-1 игровом приложении Telegram App Center — Репетитор по физике с 10+ учениками — Работал над стартапом: получили грант 300к, но проект в итоге не взлетел — Продолжаю строить стартапы — Учусь…
❤10🔥6🏆4
Импровизация vs Системность 2 разных подхода к достижению целей Один подразумевает быстрые уверенные действия, порой не структурированные и не всегда наиболее эффективные, но энергичные. Результат часто достигается количеством действий, попытками, быстрой обратной связью и корректировками Другой включает в себя достаточно долгое планирование, методичные точные действия, подчиняющиеся правилам, структуре, но часто …
❤18🔥6custom 53169949048475606454custom 53798951905237575953
Video message, posted without a caption
❤17
Video message, posted without a caption
❤21🔥10👍6custom 53169949048475606455❤🔥1
⚡️ Энергия в людях Как экстраверт, я восполняю свою энергию в компаниях: среди друзей, людей с огнём в глазах. Там чувствуется энергия движения, развития, да и просто жизни 🔥 Еще недавно заметил, что сильно заряжаюсь, когда могу помочь другим: с их запросом, поддержать в трудную минуту, подбодрить или просто искренне поговорить. В такие моменты происходит честный обмен энергиями, в котором выигрывают оба. И вот чт…
❤23🔥2
➡️ Кто вы?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Как я за 2 дня чуть не попал в Т-банк, но... ⚡️ В последние 2 дня до конца подачи заявки я вдруг осознал, что можно податься в Т-банк на позицию бизнес-аналитика Времени не так много, но в физтеховской манере я успел сделать всё, что было необходимо для подачи: — Оформление заявки на сайте с кучей полей — Оформление CV — Оформление мотивационного письма — Тест и задачи по SQL (это было весело) — Тест по математике …
❤19🙏6🤝3
Топ 5 причин, по которым закрываются стартапы (мой личный опыт) 👜 Закрытие EzShop — с этого началась моя летняя трансформация В этот проект я вкладывал энергию, деньги, и самое важное — время, на протяжении 16 месяцев. Все прошлое лето я безустанно работал над этим стартапом, день и ночь сидел в боталке в Арктике (корпус на физтехе) и постигал азы маркетинга, управления командой, тестирования гипотез. Однако принял…
custom 531699490484756064529❤10💯8
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @life_steps398. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
➡️ Кто вы?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 24 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,060,132 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Макс Зимин | Физтех, Сколково, стартапы и жизнь” (@life_steps398), 526 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/life_steps398.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.