๐ต๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
โค1
Signed แฅซแฉฃ ยทหโก

Channel
@life_codes
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
690subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001693069734 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @life_codes |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/life_codes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 690 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 690 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
34 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 18 | 52.9% | |
| ๐ฏ | 5 | 14.7% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 8.82% | |
| ๐ค | 2 | 5.88% | |
| โ | 1 | 2.94% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 1 | 2.94% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 2.94% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 2.94% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 2.94% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐ต๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
โค1
Signed แฅซแฉฃ ยทหโก
Photo, posted without a caption
โค1๐ฏ1
Signed แฅซแฉฃ ยทหโก
Photo, posted without a caption
โค2๐ฏ1
Signed แฅซแฉฃ ยทหโก
~| ๐๐ |~ โข ~ยป ๐ ๐ ๊งแฑ ยท เผ @AbOuT_InNoCeNt ๐ฅ #ฮนษณษณฯฦาฝษณฦ_ฦฒฮนษพ ๐งธ #ษฑแง_ฯาฝาฝโฮนษณษ s@AbOuT_InNoCeNt
โค1
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐ช โโคโ๊ญโ ๐o๐๐๐ ๊ญโบ =โ๐หน๐ป๐๊ง๊ฬดโฆโอ๐ฎ๐ณ
You'll See Me...!!!
โค1โคโ๐ฅ1
Signed แฅซแฉฃ ยทหโก
Callin' U: Tamally Maak - Elyanna Song ๐ค
โค2
Signed แฅซแฉฃ ยทหโก
Sticker, posted without a caption
...๐ฅ
โค2โ1๐1
song.link
โค1๐ค1
#gif
โค1๐ฅฐ1
We know they all are fake and same...still we give our precious time to them just because we have fear of being alone. ~ Zeus ๐บ #All_People โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐ฏ2โค1๐1๐ค1
Isliye maine shaadi hi nahi ki...๐คง
๐3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @life_codes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 92,500 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โโฆโอ๐๏ธโข๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ถ๐ณ๐๐น๏ฎฉูจู๏ฎฉ๏ฎฉู ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐โขโฆโอโฃ๏ธโ (@life_codes), 690 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/life_codes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.