@lifeLunaria was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@LN_lifech held 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Growth
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 02:22
107
no change
16 Sept 2026, 01:47
107
-12
9 Aug 2026, 04:17
119
no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:01
119
+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:15
118
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.44%
avg views ÷ 107 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held
37 (7 August 2026 – 14 September 2026)
Views total
202
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
181
Videos
62
Links
155
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 21s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5422796248748948435
13
17.3%
custom 5422810409256126902
13
17.3%
custom 5424632072390078052
12
16.0%
custom 5422647595635866664
9
12.0%
custom 5422844365267565429
6
8.00%
custom 5424966508608517502
6
8.00%
custom 5425141511345961001
5
6.67%
custom 5201941393936776694
4
5.33%
custom 5323276092654520315
4
5.33%
custom 5422364020420151066
2
2.67%
custom 5422411535643345371
1
1.33%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ㅤ ᛝ 𝗦𝗨𝗡`𝗗𝗔𝗬 . ♟️
– Аватюрин [ @CE4LON ]выходит на 2-х недельную стажировку на должность следящего.
Союзы не передаем.
В поисках новых союзов!
────────────────────────
#𝗕АЖНО_𝓦𝗧 #𝗥𝗘𝓟𝗢𝗦𝗧_𝓦𝗧 .
ㅤ ᛝ 𝗦𝗨𝗡`𝗗𝗔𝗬 . ♟️
– Кои [ @Nakeo0 ] выходит на 2-х недельную стажировку на должность следящего.
Союзы не передаем (у меня их нет👎).
Так же ищем союзы.🤍🤍
────────────────────────
#𝗕АЖНО_𝓦𝗧 #𝗥𝗘𝓟𝗢𝗦𝗧_𝓦𝗧 .
Важно!! Я, Линша, отдаю некоторых своих союзников моим лайф админам. Это было сделано, для того, что у них было побольше союзов. На вас уже подписываются и добавляют в свои списки.
К Раппе переходят ( @YaoSHECbot ) :
1. 𝐋𝐮𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐬
2. 𝂅ׄ 𝅄ઽꪋ𝛾ꫝꪋ𝔱𝔢 ׁ⎯꯭𝆕 𝅘𝅥𝅮 𝅄
К Бутхиллу переходят ( @HillSHECbot ) :
1. 「 𝙏𝘩𝘦 𝙏✶𝘨𝘦𝘳'𝘴 𝙇𝘢𝘪𝘳 」
2. 🌬️🍁𝑴𝒂𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝑾𝒊𝒏𝒅
3. 𝙈𝕴𝖣⃟𝗡𝅥⃬⃨𝕴︭𝖦𝗛𑪓𑪕𝕋 𝕊⃨𝕺𝖢𝕴𝝣݄፝⃟𝖳𝘠ۜ
4. ɢᴀᴄʜᴀᴠᴇʀs
5. 𝕊𝕚𝕝…
❌🎵 𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 🎵
#𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗛𝗧 #𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗛𝗧 ⫶ ִ ׄ 🎁 ៸
🍓 – Недавно мир цирка, обычно наполненный смехом, аплодисментами и волшебством, сотрясла неприятная новость. В одной из наших цирковых трупп были обнаружены предатели. Люди, которые долгое время были частью нашей дружной семьи, делили с нами радости и трудности, оказались способны на поступок, который подорвал доверие и нарушил негласные законы нашего сооб…
𓍢ִ໋ ⌇ :: 𝕵αнαϐℯ𝔠 о𝔭ɣ𝔠καℯϯ𝔠я, α ϐо𝔠κρℯ𝔠ная чистка в 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝕽𝖆𝖞 подведена к концу. Занавес закрывается для тех, кто не справился с уставной нормой, и мы подводим итоги этой недели.
❌☥ ──────── ♟ ──────── ☥
⟦ 𝕴ϯоги 𝕬κϯиϐно𝔠ϯи 𝕵α 𝕹ℯ∂ℯлю ⟧
𓍢ִ໋ ⌇ :: Общее количество сообщений во флуде: [ 10, 242 ]
𓍢ִ໋ ⌇ :: ТОП–3 активиста этой недели:
├ 🌟 :: Анакса — [ 2, 174 ] (как всегда на высоте)
├ 🌟 :: Рери — [ 1, 280 ]…
Очень важная информация. По личным причинам и обстоятельствам Капитано покинул наш проект. Все его союзы переходят ко мне (@FlinsCRbot). В течение двух дней я подпишусь на всех его союзников. Если вы делаете разрыв, пожалуйста, сообщите об этом. Также, если вы сменили ссылки и прочее, напишите об этом. Семейные союзы Капитано также останутся семейными союзами, если вы того хотите. В следящих прошу указать моего бота …
⃝✿ 𝐿𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑒
мои союзники, простите что вчера не провела рп-тайм у меня плохое самочувствие, я постараюсь провести его завтра
#ⲙᥙρныᥱ_дᥱньκᥙ #ʙᥲжн᧐ᥱ𐌽ig_Tᥕ не требует репоста
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @lifeLunaria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑳𝑼𝑵𝑨𝑹𝑰𝑨 𝑭𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑫ᴸⁱᶠᵉ” (@lifeLunaria), 107 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifeLunaria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
