Channel
@lifeFOWD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004494811532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lifeFOWD |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 29 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lifeFOWD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 19 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 19 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 596 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 20 | 64.5% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NEW VIDEO Новое видео ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ На нашем тт канале вышло новое видео, будем рады, если вы его поддержите!! • author: #Kanae • idea: not ours • info: infoFOWD • life: lifeFOWD ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ #newvideo #новое видео #FOWD
❤3💘1🕊1
important Важно ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ В нашем дорогом флуде, в данный момент идёт конкурс, на алмаз, за 100 звёзд. Вы должны набрать 2,5к сообщений. Буду очень рада, если примите участие. ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ #Important #важно #𝙁𝙊𝙒𝘿
🕊1
NEW UNION Новый союз Даже если сейчас всё кажется тёмным, мы рядом — и мы вместе отыщем хоть один лучик. Обещаю! ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ Новый союз - новые друзья! Давайте познакомимся с нашими друзьями: ꣑ৎИнфо: @energy_inf0 Лайф: @energy_lifeChannel ꣑ৎ ꣑ৎСЛЕДЯЩИЙ: @anchoys_byl_byl ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ #newunion #дружескийсоюз
🕊1
COLLABORATION Коллаборация ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ • Благодарим, за коллаборацию. ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ #collab #𝙁𝙊𝙒𝘿
🕊1
⠀⃝𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙤 ────────────────────── #COLLABORATION | 𝗶𝗱: наша ────────────────────── ● ୨୨ - 𝙲𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕 | | ¹4+ Тик Ток: rik1axx_ Инфо: @celestial_Riyo Лайф: @celestial_Riyoo Владелец: @AkiOF1 ────────────────────── ● 𝕊𝕚𝕝𝕖𝕟𝕥 𝔽𝕝𝕠𝕠𝕕 Тик Ток: silent._flood Инфо: @silentf_lood Лайф: @podsluhanoflood Владелец: @buzzzy_1 ────────────────────── ● 𐚁ֶָ๋࣭֢ 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙣 』 ┈ 𝓯𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓭 🂱 Тик Ток: flood_wendigo Инфо: @carnelianflood Лайф: …
🕊1
Video, posted without a caption
🕊1🤯1
NEW UNION Новый союз Даже если сейчас всё кажется тёмным, мы рядом — и мы вместе отыщем хоть один лучик. Обещаю! ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ Новый союз - новые друзья! Давайте познакомимся с нашими друзьями: Lunny flood ꣑ৎ𝙄𝙉𝙁𝙊: @Fludaowsemfd32 𝙇𝙄𝙁𝙀: @Life_lunny_flud ꣑ৎ ꣑ৎСЛЕДЯЩИЙ: @seny_00_1 ◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈—◈ #newunion #дружескийсоюз
💋1💘1🕊1
#репост #repost #𝙁𝙊𝙒𝘿
🕊1
Так, у нас флуд пока что в ресте, до 25 участников (не учитывая ботов) и мы ищем союзы/монтажёров/участников, что бы развивать наш флуд, надеемся на ваше понимание, в скором времени мы обезательно откроемся ----------------- От ВЛД:извините, я хз чо ставить на фото, так что поставлю это что ли, и да, нам нужен монтажёр с хорошим монтажем и активный ----------------- #repost, #репост, #поиски_монтажёра_учатсников_союз…
🕊1
Минутка репоста. Простите, если помешали. #repost #репост #𝙁𝙊𝙒𝘿
🕊1
[Makio]— Не забываем про бинго дорогие союзники которые в списке! #Важно (не репост)
🕊1
𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐎 Благодарим SNOWFLAKE FLOOD за передачу бинго!! Передаём бинго дальше: — 𓂃⩇⩇.⩇⩇/𝒁𝖊r𝔬-𝑫a𝖞 𝑳𝖊g𝒂𝖈𝒚𓏴 ۫ ۫ 𝅄ׄ𝑳𝒊𝒇𝒆 — 彡𝂅⸝︎ִ ꐚ 𝒲𝙞sdo𝘮'𝑠 𝒪𝙫𝙚𝘳𝘧𝑙o𝑤 𝄖 ::۫ꪆ࿐ — 𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗔𝗥𝗫 𝗠𝗢𝗢𝗡𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗘 — dark mirage — 彡•₊ 𝒦ᴏnᴏhᴀ 𝒫ᴀᴛh's.𐙚₊ 𓂃ഒ Правила: ⌁ Передать бинго 5+ союзникам. ⌁ Заполнить клетки. Удачи всем!
🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lifeFOWD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 254,295 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lifeFOWD named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑳𝑰𝑭𝑬 • °• ~ 𝐹𝐿𝒪𝒪𝒟 𝒪𝐹 𝒲𝐼𝒩𝒢𝐸𝒟 𝒟𝑅𝐸𝒜𝑀𝒮 ~ •°” (@lifeFOWD), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifeFOWD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.