Channel
@liciya_brand
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
97subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001945476173 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liciya_brand |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liciya_brand |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 97 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 97 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (4 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 483 |
| Reactions total | 64 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
82 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5314668415552603420 | 31 | 37.8% | |
| custom 5440647318242086651 | 17 | 20.7% | |
| custom 5300833733186699568 | 14 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5305483997357293968 | 9 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5334681773446025191 | 9 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5314372337687085302 | 2 | 2.44% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет! 🐾 На этой неделе я провожу несколько групповых занятий, чтобы собрать средства для приюта собак. Если вам интересно, напишите в комментариях. Ссылка на инстаграм собачек: https://www.instagram.com/zhiteli_dobryipes_khv?igsh=ZmFiamdtdnQ4d3Jw
custom 53054839973572939685custom 53008337331866995684
Вчера таки состоялся наш нарядный творческий пикник! Спасибо всем, кто доверился мне и на него пришёл - без вас ничего этого бы не осуществилось. Тема этого творческого собрания «ТАРО», и всё действительно сложилось волшебным образом хорошо! Очень переживали, что погода подведет, приготовили тент, но весь день светило солнце. Я так рада, что девчонки заморочились с нарядами. Этот пикник превратился в праздник, на к…
custom 531466841555260342010custom 54406473182420866512
Сегодня свершалось волшебство ✨ Подробности расскажу завтра, надо срочно поспать!
custom 53146684155526034208custom 54406473182420866516custom 53143723376870853022
📔 Я непростительно мало рассказывала о том, какой крутой пикник готовлю 8 августа! Поэтому для тех, кто сомневается и тех, кто пропустил информацию - ловите расписание дня: 🔮 С 15:30 до 16:00 мы собираемся в нашей загадочной секретной локации и вы восхищаетесь, и любуетесь крутыми декорациями. 🔮 С 17:00 - 18:00 две чудесные травницы проведут для вас мастер-класс по завариванию чая - вы будете собирать своё уникал…
custom 53008337331866995685custom 54406473182420866513custom 53346817734460251912
Эти штаны я вязала ~ 3,5 месяца. Чтобы понять, что и как. Распустить и переделать в плед. Ну а что? 🐻
custom 53008337331866995685custom 53054839973572939684custom 53346817734460251912custom 53146684155526034201
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53146684155526034204custom 53346817734460251911
LICIYA pinned a photo
В таких вайбах будем, декор сама собираю, клею, шью 💜 *картинки из пинтерест
custom 53146684155526034208custom 54406473182420866516custom 53346817734460251914
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @liciya_brand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 99,148 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LICIYA” (@liciya_brand), 97 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liciya_brand.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.