Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for О личном публично

Channel

О личном публично

@lichnoye_publichno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

84subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002370735681
TypeChannel
Username@lichnoye_publichno
DescriptionРассказываю все, что сама знаю!
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lichnoye_publichno

Growth

849 Aug 2026, 13:31 — 84 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:16 — 84 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 13:319 Aug 2026, 17:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:1684no change
9 Aug 2026, 13:3184first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
86.5%
avg views ÷ 84 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.6
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (16 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total581
Reactions total77
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
1
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

260 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53864348924122323736826.2%
5822.3%
custom 52403308381255839463212.3%
custom 5240280982145212087259.62%
custom 5341435600929038289218.08%
custom 5386324065076127111218.08%
👍155.77%
custom 5235578512647134770103.85%
custom 5337241874602140493103.85%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lichnoye_publichno. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC34 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @shiva_ra04Photo

Я хочу сказать, если бы ты была коммерческим проектом - ты бы была ведьминским магазином Психолог: @DemidovaElena090

7 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC38 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Умею определять типы людей через ассоциацию с коммерчискими проектами.

5custom 53864348924122323735custom 52403308381255839464

3 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC80 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🦠Неделю болела какой-то жуткой хворью (просто простуда) и наконец-то вышла на работу, но чувствую какую-то жуткую усталость Каждый из нас чувствовал сильную подавленность и утомленность во время болезни, хотя, казалось бы, лежишь, ешь и спишь. Тогда почему так происходит? Ну, на самом деле, мы в этот момент не просто "лежим и болеем", организм тратит много сил и ресурсов на борьбу с вирусом, от этого у нас нет физиче

6custom 52402809821452120873custom 53372418746021404933custom 53864348924122323731

31 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC82 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Рискнуть и выложить это в рилсы в инсте? Хочу получить еще бан)

👍4custom 524028098214521208732

30 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC90 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

За это видео мне дали теневой бан в тиктоке! Вот вам и мемы(

14custom 53864348924122323735custom 52402809821452120873👍1

28 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC85 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Пиплы, вам реально интересна моя жизнь и работа? Я не просто нпс в кресле/на экране телефона для вас?🥺🥺🥺 Мне приятно

12custom 52403308381255839463custom 53864348924122323733

28 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC88 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Что же постить🧌

  1. Как и сейчас (умное)35%
  2. Мемы)58%
  3. Больше повседневного контента про жизнь психолога62%
  4. Побольше рекомендаций всяких книг, техник, упражнений и т.д.23%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC84 viewsread 9 August 2026

Уважаемые пиплы, у меня иссяк запас тем для канала, я трачу весь потенциал на создание мемов в тикток, что бы вам вообще хотелось тут видеть?

24 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC148 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🫠У меня уже у самой произошел кризис на фоне написания постов про кризисы, но по-хорошему надо рассказать еще не только про то, что кризис такое, а как из него выбраться... Ладно, ок, давайте я это сделаю в конце концов.... Люди выбирают разные стратегии проживания кризиса, вот основные 3: 1. Не принимать свой кризис — стараться игнорировать его, обесценивать свои эмоции и ощущения в этот момент. В итоге кризис про

custom 52402809821452120879👍5custom 524033083812558394653custom 53372418746021404931

26 May 2026, 15:48 UTC158 views24 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

🧊Экзистенциальный кризис. Что это помимо мема? - Это процесс «слома» привычных установок, вплоть до потери смысла жизни. Чувство глубокого психологического дискомфорта, чувство неизбежности и необратимости каких-либо процессов Характерные чувства во время экзистенциального кризиса: 🧐Чувство безысходности 🧐Ощущение бессмысленности своей жизни 🧐Чувство одиночества 🧐Ощущение, что вас никто не понимает, да и вы сам

custom 538643489241223237311custom 52402809821452120877custom 53372418746021404936

15 May 2026, 19:54 UTC147 viewsread 9 August 2026

Почему на мою болезнь поставили много реакций, а на пост всего две?(

15 May 2026, 12:50 UTC157 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🧐Возрастные кризисы: взрослые Эти кризисы уже не связаны с телесными изменениями и необходимостью к ним адаптироваться. Здесь важно решать социальные задачи и внутренние конфликты каждого возрастного этапа: выбор профессии, создание пары и первый опыт сожительства, рождение детей и прочее 6. Молодость (20–39 лет) — начало зрелости личности, время «учиться жить». Задачи: создание семьи и притирка в ней, поиск себя

custom 5386434892412232373117custom 53414356009290382894custom 53863240650761271113

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lichnoye_publichno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

Что же постить🧌

  1. Как и сейчас (умное)35%
  2. Мемы)58%
  3. Больше повседневного контента про жизнь психолога62%
  4. Побольше рекомендаций всяких книг, техник, упражнений и т.д.23%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,310,659 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“О личном публично” (@lichnoye_publichno), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lichnoye_publichno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.