Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Лис

@liceeef

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

431subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001921794937
TypeChannel
Username@liceeef
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/liceeef

Growth

43111 Aug 2026, 20:17 — 431 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 20:30 — 431 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 20:1711 Aug 2026, 20:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 430–432 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 20:30431no change
11 Aug 2026, 20:17431first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
400
Videos
2
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

778 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17222.1%
custom 540244574880767990810413.4%
custom 542044888591290866610313.2%
custom 547446488570844491810012.9%
custom 51998081695801864828310.7%
custom 5427205264606531718587.46%
🍓526.68%
😭263.34%
👾243.08%
custom 5337158655315843583232.96%
🕊151.93%
custom 5796655834557589471101.29%
❤‍🔥81.03%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 778reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC139 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Всем привет кста, у меня там в тик токе видосик новый😄😄😄 Лайкните по братски 🥲 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSXS9rHfF/

custom 54272052646065317188custom 53371586553158435832custom 54204488859129086661custom 57966558345575894711

15 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC141 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Обоже не прошло и три года как я сделала инфопост хаха

custom 54272052646065317187

15 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC148 views40 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☑️☑️☑️☑️☑️☑️☑️☑️☑️☑️ 🤍🤩🤩🤩🤍 🪽Всем прив, зовут меня Фелис, но можно просто Лис🥰 🪽Мои соц. сетки: 🖤Тик ток 🖤Тви(X) 🖤Анонимка 🪽Обо мне всякое 🤩 Мой др: 21.01 🤩 Рисую по разным фд, но в основном это ХСР, Аркнайтс, Аркнайтс: Эндфилд, иногда аниме 90х (революционерка Утэна, Сакура собирательница карт и т.д) 🤩 Иногда рисую свою ОСку, но больше на др или для оформления постов и авы для соц сетей 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧

custom 542720526460653171818👾9custom 53371586553158435836custom 579665583455758947142custom 54204488859129086661

25 Jun 2026, 14:46 UTC250 views55 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Полноценки че то в последнее время не идут совсем, так что сегодня опять на скетчевом😃 И ваще поскорее бы уже баннер Камиля, я устала ждать🐺🐺🐺

custom 542720526460653171824custom 53371586553158435831412custom 57966558345575894715

13 Jun 2026, 07:36 UTC329 views65 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Поскетчила вчера любимок 🥰 Надо будет еще Мадоку к ним нарисовать потом🫳

custom 519980816958018648228custom 540244574880767990819custom 547446488570844491812❤‍🔥31custom 53371586553158435831custom 54272052646065317181

4 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC392 views45 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Надо будет полноценку заебашить в их гольф луках, я уже миллион лет об этом мечтаю🥺 Почему ваще никто до сих пор не рисовал их играющих в гольф, это же максимально их вайб 🤩 Ну или мб я просто не видела...

custom 519980816958018648223custom 540244574880767990812custom 547446488570844491810

4 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,170 views98 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ленивые сантюрин скетчи🫳🫳🫳

custom 542044888591290866648custom 540244574880767990824custom 5474464885708444918204🍓1custom 51998081695801864821

31 May 2026, 13:39 UTC418 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Капец у меня конечно стиль скачет иногда... 😀 Но самое главное, что заказчице понравилось❤️ И теперь это моя любимая работка

16👾8custom 54204488859129086666❤‍🔥2🍓1🕊1

31 May 2026, 13:38 UTC362 views53 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вторая коммишечка для любимки🥹🥹🥹

26custom 547446488570844491812custom 542044888591290866611🕊2custom 51998081695801864821custom 54024457488076799081

25 May 2026, 15:48 UTC359 views56 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Коммишечка 👄🤩👄

custom 54024457488076799082420🕊9custom 54204488859129086662custom 54744648857084449181

18 May 2026, 14:10 UTC378 views41 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Мне кажется, что все отпишутся, если я пару раз нарисую что то не по хонке или не сантюринов хаха

😭26custom 54744648857084449189👾4🕊1custom 54024457488076799081

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @liceeef. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,391,348 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лис” (@liceeef), 431 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liceeef.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.