Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЛПZ

@libzapu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

118subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188347254
TypeChannel
Username@libzapu
DescriptionОбщественно-политическое движение «Либертарианцы за Путина», на страже неортодоксальной либертарианской философии!
Created24 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/libzapu

Growth

1186 August 2026 — 118 subscribers9 August 2026 — 118 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:46118no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:39118first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,350
Videos
333
Links
458

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 58s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

261 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6725.7%
😁6223.8%
🤡4115.7%
3714.2%
😢207.66%
🔥62.30%
🍾51.92%
🤣51.92%
👎41.53%
🥴41.53%
20.766%
💯20.766%
🤨20.766%
🥱20.766%
🤔10.383%
🤯10.383%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2022 to 31 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2022, 15:34 UTC≈1,330 views54 reactionsread 9 August 2026

НОВОГОДНЕЕ ПРОЩАЛЬНОЕ Да, прощальное. Настала пора закрывать этот канал. Лучшей даты под это дело и не найти. Говорят, что в Новый Год надо входить, оставляя весь балласт. Увы и ах, канал стал мне таковым. Во-первых, меня не устраивал тот результат, который показывала статистика охвата аудитории в течение двух лет существования ЛПЗ. Мечталось мне вкатиться в тележную медийку, а по итогу не собрал и трёх сотен подпис

36🤡15👍3

Signed Иван Крылов

9 Dec 2022, 14:08 UTC≈1,240 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Канал замораживается на неопределённый срок. Много забот. Прошу понять и простить.

😢20🍾5👍3🤡3🤨2

Signed Иван Крылов

7 Dec 2022, 07:47 UTC≈1,230 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Если цели не удастся достичь мирным путём, превратив Украину в нормальное, добрососедское государство, из которого не будет исходить угроза России, значит, эта цель будет достигнута путём военным — постпред России в ООН Василий Небензя.

👍8🤣5🥴42💯1

Signed Иван Крылов

6 Dec 2022, 13:46 UTC≈1,120 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как работает ЦИПсО на примере (Да, пример выбран осознано. И да, вы тут меня потеряли, так что об этом будет подробней в следующем посте) Что происходит? Вам продают эмоцию. Конкретно злость. Ее продать легче и она лучше всего отключает критическое мышление. А главное - желание разобраться в теме. Так как «Путин слил», «Эрдоган всех поимел», ну и моё любимое: «Что этот Султан себе позволяет?». Злость прекрасно работ

👍41🥱1

Signed Иван Крылов

4 Dec 2022, 15:13 UTC623 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sueverdem

​​Как оказалось, Штирлицы из посольства США в Москве даже не слышали о таком термине, как "конспирация". Так, одним репостом подтвердили данные о том, что "Феминистское антивоенное сопротивление" (сами себя они сокращенно называют ФАС) и вся их деятельность финансируется из карманов американских налогоплательщиков. Речь идёт о поддержке некой петиции на сайте Change.org, которая подписана именем "матерей России". Не

🤡6

Signed Иван Крылов

4 Dec 2022, 09:05 UTC480 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @HistoryOFuaPhoto

Про "выпитый" китайцами Байкал, "отданную" им же Сибирь и прочее. Аналог той же чепухи из 1942 года. Похоже с тем, что тулят сейчас, да?

👍8

Signed Иван Крылов

1 Dec 2022, 17:52 UTC453 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @medvedev_telegramVideo

Про нацистов в Европе

👍6👎1

Signed Иван Крылов

1 Dec 2022, 09:22 UTC605 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Даже нейросеть вычислила пристрастия Каксима Маца.

😁16🥱1

Signed Иван Крылов

30 Nov 2022, 10:56 UTC501 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Владимир Путин о «культуре отмены»: «Нашу культуру неумные люди отменяют, а мы ничего из лучших образцов культуры других стран не только не отменяем, но и продвигаем вперед те идеи и гуманистические начала, которые заложены в этих произведениях. Мы умные, а те, кто отменяет нашу культуру — не очень».

👍11

Signed Иван Крылов

30 Nov 2022, 10:51 UTC443 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Глава Еврокомиссии Урсула фон дер Ляйен опубликовала в своём твиттер-аккаунте видео, в котором заявила, что количество погибших солдат ВСУ достигло примерно 100 тысяч человек. Затем фрагмент с этой её фразой ВНЕЗАПНО исчез.

🤡8

Signed Иван Крылов

30 Nov 2022, 10:24 UTC401 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Critical thinking be like:

😁12

Signed Иван Крылов

30 Nov 2022, 08:59 UTC353 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Думайте...

🤡9😁3🤔1🤯1

Signed Иван Крылов

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @libzapu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,135,104 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЛПZ” (@libzapu), 118 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libzapu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.