Channel
@libspace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
277subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003945946721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @libspace |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 21 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/libspace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 277 | +28 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 249 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 245 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 245 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,864 |
| Reactions total | 157 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
157 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 72 | 45.9% | |
| ⚡ | 39 | 24.8% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 12.1% | |
| 👀 | 14 | 8.92% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 8.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, всем привет ✦ В эфире рубрика «история от подписчика» — здесь вы делитесь тем, что происходит в проектах, дизайнерской жизни прямо сейчас или что вас волнует, а мы вместе обсуждаем и пытаемся разобраться Последний запрос такой: Здравствуйте! Хотела написать свою историю для рубрики. Она как раз связана, как мне кажется, с выгоранием. Дело в том, что пока училась на дизайнера в универе, я параллельно работа…
⚡5👀2💘2
Video message, posted without a caption
⚡7💘5
Всем привет, друзья 🤍 На связи Маша Ловите кружочек из закулисья: показываю, как ищу материалы для библиотеки ✦
Привет, друзья 🩵 Знаем это чувство, когда садишься делать контент и просто не знаешь, о чём говорить — особенно если цель не лайки, а клиенты. Поэтому добавили в библиотеку статью от @jupiternaya «55 идей для контента, если ваша цель = клиенты». Внутри: 🩵идеи, которые расширяют охват и приводят новую аудиторию в блог 🩵идеи, которые показывают вашу компетентность 🩵идеи, которые прогревают именно к вам, как к специ…
💘11🕊7👀3
Рубрика «история от подписчика» Когда-то Ася уже вела её в своём канале, а теперь хочет перенести сюда — в наше дизайн-комьюнити🫐 Как это работает? 💬 вы отправляете историю через бота → @jupiternaya_onlinebot 💬 мы публикуем её анонимно 💬 а дальше вместе ищем решение, делимся опытом и поддерживаем друг друга в комментариях. Это может быть всё что угодно: сложный клиент, выгорание, страх, поиск работы, конфликт в…
💘6⚡2👀2
Вас уже 200, спасибо! 🥹🩵
⚡9💘5👀2
✦ Кто стоит за LibSpace? Пора познакомиться ближе 🩵 Привет! Мы Ася и Маша. Давно дружим, любим создавать полезные проекты и очень по-разному смотрим на одни и те же задачи. Наверное, именно поэтому LibSpace вообще появилась такой, какой вы её видите сейчас. Ася @jupiternaya Она отвечает за концепцию проекта, его развитие, дизайн, структуру и то, каким LibSpace становится сегодня. Именно благодаря ей библиотека пе…
💘16⚡4
💬 Как ваши выходные, чем занимаетесь?
💘3
✦ Субботний дайджест ✦ По субботам будем собирать здесь, что нового появилось в библиотеке за неделю. На этой неделе добавили два видео: 📎 Выравнивание Auto Layout в Figma — важная тема, которая ускорит вашу работу! 📎 Создаём дизайн-портфолио для фриланса и найма — полный гайд. Вторую тему просили в комментариях, надеемся, что будет полезно 💙 Продолжаем пополнять раздел специалистов — там уже есть новые люди, е…
💘13⚡4
Друзья, всем привет! Спасибо всем, кто откликнулся под нашим предыдущим постом 💙 Уже взяли в работу и подбираем для вас полезные материалы ✦
⚡5💘3👀2
✦ Друзья, созываем всех до единого! У нас появился вопрос: какие сейчас у вас есть затыки в дизайне? Пишите в комментах — по частым темам соберём разборы и уроки в библиотеку 💙
👀3
✦ Что уже есть внутри LibSpace? Если вы только недавно присоединились, давайте покажем, что уже можно найти в библиотеке 🩵 Сейчас внутри постепенно собирается пространство, где дизайнеру можно не только искать информацию, но и возвращаться за ней снова и снова. Пока здесь уже есть: 💙материалы и подборки Статьи, видео: полезные находки, которые помогают учиться и развиваться 💙специалисты Страница с дизайнерами ра…
💘8⚡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @libspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 139,812 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LibSpace | библиотека для дизайнеров” (@libspace), 277 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libspace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.