Channel
@libraslibrary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002483208285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @libraslibrary |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/libraslibrary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 45 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 43 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 43 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 1 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (1 February 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 61 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 86.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
а еще я out of curiosity начала читать новую книгу ребекки куанг и… fellas i am so disappointed. люблю мисс куанг всем сердцем за опиумные войны и вавилон, но все последующее, что я читала (йеллоуфейс, катабазис, теперь и тайпей стори) с каждым разом все больше мне не нравится… such a tragedy to lose a favourite author, однако новые её книги, видимо, совсем не для меня ! и это окей
❤4
посмотрела интервью с оушеном вуонг от моего любимки джека эдвардса. my mind is BLOWN. конечно, я уже знала, что человек умеет невероятно обращаться со словами после on earth we’re briefly gorgeous, однако то, КАК он говорит, и то, какие мысли он озвучивает… то, сколько новых перспектив он открыл мне на, казалось бы, привычные вещи за всего один час ? я хочу слушать его бесконечно
🔥1
яма. александр куприн как всегда, русская литература со своей честностью вывернет наизнанку… ужасно, отвратительно, мучительно, хочется волосы на себе рвать от безысходности и какого-то вымышленного (да не такого уж и вымышленного) горя. а от того, как простодушно и прямолинейно написано, еще хуже.. я даже плакать не могла, только в ужасе цепенеть
❤6🔥2💋1
поклонник вулканов. сьюзен сонтаг // the volcano lover. susan sontag дочитала уже давно, но захотелось вернуть блог к жизни сейчас. очень люблю сонтаг и её эссе, и я понятия не имела, что она писала художку. однако эта книга очень странная… огромная, тягучая, полная страниц, где не происходит ничего. сюжет - скорее не сюжет, а просто биография одного богатого коллекционера, одержимого вулканом. не могу сказать, что…
❤4
по окончании семестра, наконец, появилось время полноценно вернуться к чтению ! за прошедший месяц прочитала четыре произведения. краткие (и не очень) мысли: 1. on the calculation of volume I. solvej balle // об исчислении объема. сольвей балле // om udregning af rumfang. solvej balle меня так заинтересовало описание книги: ‘временная петля повторяет один день тары селтер, торговца редкими и антикварными книгами’ —…
❤4
библиотека + пинакотека амброзиана в милане с рукописями да винчи и НЕРЕАЛЬНЫМ витражом по божественной комедии авторства бертини
❤4
эх вот бы всегда с таким видом читать
❤9🍓1🥰1
on earth we're briefly gorgeous. ocean vuong // лишь краткий миг земной мы все прекрасны. оушен вуонг редко, очень редко встречаются такие авторы, как оушен вуонг. сложно описать словами, но чтение этой книги ощущалось, как поддаться течению реки, как уносящий с собой шторм, как неутолимая жажда - я не писательница, чтобы уметь в метафоры, но вы поняли мысль: перестать читать было почти невозможно. написано просто н…
❤3
eros the bittersweet. anne carson // горько-сладкий эрос. энн карсон потрясающий сборник эссе о любви и желании, и о том, как авторы от античности до наших дней их осмысляли. одновременно чувствую единение с людьми, жившими и любившими тысячи лет назад, и смирение с тем, что ни одна моя мысль и ни одно чувство не являются новыми в контексте человечества — truly bittersweet. книга для тех, кто когда-либо любил. 5 / …
❤5
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @libraslibrary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“libra’s library; ⚖️” (@libraslibrary), 45 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libraslibrary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.