Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🪦либидо альтушки вскрылись

@libido_fm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002162924327
TypeChannel
Username@libido_fm
Descriptionэй тянка шаришь за альт?))))
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 15 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/libido_fm

Growth

2711 Aug 2026, 23:46 — 27 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 00:00 — 27 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:4612 Aug 2026, 00:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:0027no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:4627first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
58
Videos
27
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

176 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54565215173680969043017.0%
custom 52922267862292459942614.8%
custom 52695050563187013512413.6%
custom 5231371373137374995179.66%
custom 5292135780167212347179.66%
custom 5292209541935554997169.09%
custom 5291933826509983963158.52%
custom 5292020215482175285126.82%
custom 5292286280116227230126.82%
custom 529175715732523038073.98%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2024 to 11 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2024, 21:00 UTC≈3,590 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✨ну что, хай чудилки, к сожалению мы к вам с очень печальной вестью, мы приняли решение о закрытие 😭 всей администрацией Либидо мы хотим сказать, что мы вас любили, вы стали нашей семьей, надеемся, что мы с вами ещё увидимся! все союзы разрываются, кроме семейных, всем удачи, наши дорогие🙂 либидо вас любят🎉

custom 52922267862292459944custom 54565215173680969044custom 52695050563187013513

4 Oct 2024, 10:00 UTC≈3,290 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

чудилы, зацените какую красоту сделала для нас наша любимая Соль, целуем ей ручки всей администрацией, цем👐

custom 54565215173680969043custom 52695050563187013512custom 52920202154821752852custom 52921357801672123472custom 52922095419355549972custom 52922267862292459942custom 52313713731373749951

Signed #𝟎𝟑𝟑``ᴏʟᴠ.ᴍ ᴸᵇᵈ

3 Oct 2024, 10:00 UTC≈2,800 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🌟КОЛЛАБ С АЛЬТУШКАМИ 🤩 – спасибо всем за участие, будем ждать вас ещё! уствовали: @b1nisk @GU1LTYFM @mrffml @pschfm @YMLFM @easyxven @leninskfm @cupidso @dez_kf

custom 52313713731373749953custom 54565215173680969043custom 52695050563187013512custom 52920202154821752852custom 52921357801672123472custom 52922095419355549972custom 52922862801162272302custom 52922267862292459941

Signed клоун флорал

28 Sept 2024, 15:50 UTC≈2,020 viewsread 12 August 2026

— порадуйте нас реакциями и комментариями, пожалуйста 🤩 также вы можете предложить свои варианты персонажей на наш разбор, мы их сохраняем и в дальнейшем будем использовать!

28 Sept 2024, 15:50 UTC≈1,880 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❣️@альт_тиндер <<--- #ат Дарси🤩 «клуб Винкс» мх~~ я бы с удовольствием сидела у ног этой госпожи, будто зачарованная, но такой экстрим манипуляций и абьюза не для каждого, девочки. давайте перейдём к дополнительным мнениям экспертов о возможных проблемах: 🤩СТАВИМ: — 9/10, выглядит так, будто посадит тебя на поводок, мне нравятся доминантные женщины, я под каблуком. — 4/10, синяки под глазами конечно ахуеть, наверное

custom 52922267862292459947custom 52921357801672123474custom 52922095419355549974custom 54565215173680969044custom 52695050563187013513custom 52919338265099839633custom 52313713731373749951

24 Sept 2024, 18:51 UTC≈1,340 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

✨| У вас тоже половина администрации в ресте? Как справляетесь с началом учебного года?

custom 52313713731373749954custom 52695050563187013514custom 52917571573252303803custom 52919338265099839633custom 54565215173680969043custom 52922095419355549972

Signed tangerine fr lbd

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @libido_fm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,006,530 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🪦либидо альтушки вскрылись” (@libido_fm), 27 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libido_fm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.