Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +2,925. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,976–54,779 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 22:58
54,340
+72
16 Sept 2026, 17:21
54,268
+5
14 Sept 2026, 20:20
54,263
+132
13 Sept 2026, 06:19
54,131
+88
11 Sept 2026, 11:59
54,043
+81
8 Sept 2026, 20:16
53,962
+42
5 Sept 2026, 15:58
53,920
+101
3 Sept 2026, 14:36
53,819
+84
2 Sept 2026, 10:58
53,735
+70
1 Sept 2026, 10:35
53,665
+98
31 Aug 2026, 11:34
53,567
+190
30 Aug 2026, 10:55
53,377
+109
29 Aug 2026, 13:48
53,268
+86
28 Aug 2026, 12:36
53,182
+70
27 Aug 2026, 09:08
53,112
+119
26 Aug 2026, 06:32
52,993
+99
25 Aug 2026, 04:16
52,894
+88
23 Aug 2026, 21:54
52,806
+161
22 Aug 2026, 06:35
52,645
+119
20 Aug 2026, 21:26
52,526
first reading
Engagement
210 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.58%
avg views ÷ 54,340 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
136 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
136
of 210 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 133 of 136 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
210 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
190,419
Reactions total
2,970
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 04:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,520
Videos
≈2,730
Links
≈684
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 25m
Average length
2m 05s
Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,446 reactions across 207 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5332555025900130640
1,633
36.7%
❤
779
17.5%
🤣
713
16.0%
🔥
530
11.9%
🗿
170
3.82%
😁
127
2.86%
👏
84
1.89%
🤯
54
1.21%
😐
49
1.10%
😱
40
0.9%
😢
33
0.742%
😍
25
0.562%
🙈
23
0.517%
🤬
23
0.517%
🍾
19
0.427%
🐳
19
0.427%
👌
18
0.405%
🤔
17
0.382%
🤨
16
0.36%
🥰
16
0.36%
10 further kinds
58
1.30%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 210 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,446 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 210 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 210 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @libertycitynet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 210 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🐎 GTA 5 still has remnants of cut horse-riding mechanics in its files — VGTimes dug into how far development actually went
Horse-related files were first discovered in GTA 5 back in 2015, but the system has never been examined in this much detail. VGTimes' editorial team studied files from the retail version of the game, with Rockstar's working materials from a 192 GB archive helping them make sense of it all.
Here…
🥽 POV: you're a cop with depression — Max Payne 2 is getting a VR mod
You'll be able to throw guns at enemies and come up with 100 different ways to pull off a ridiculously stylish reload in 1–2 weeks — the dev says the release is coming soon.
👀 GTA 6's soundtrack album is already being advertised in Times Square
Not surprising, but they went with one of the biggest billboards, telling people to listen to the whole playlist on YouTube.
🍁 Gear up for fall with cashback and even bigger discounts on top Steam games at Difmark Marketplace
— Go to Difmark
— Choose whatever you want
— Get cashback up to 10% — the more you buy, the more you save in the future
➡️ Use Promo code COOL to get 15% off!
In stock:
— Dune: Awakening
— Bodycam
— The Blood of Dawnwalker
— Grand Theft Auto 6
— Halloween The Game
— Wardogs
— RuneScape: Dragonwilds
— 007 First Lig…
🔐 GTA Online is now running on Nintendo Switch — and the PS4 version just got cracked
The team behind the fan-made GTA 5 port for Switch managed to get into GTA Online. They even promise to bring the Cayo Perico heist and port everything to Android.
Meanwhile, the PS4 version has been hacked. This happened thanks to a console firmware exploit from as far ahead as June 2026. Mod menus, level 8000 accounts, billions …
🖥 Rockstar updates its modding guidelines
Here's the key takeaways from their post summing up all the documents:
— You can't mess with game stories or worlds: no expanding, changing or merging storylines, missions or maps from Rockstar games, and no using actors' voices without permission
— Multiplayer mods are only allowed through the official platform (so no RAGEMP, only FiveM)
— Monetization is only allowed throu…
🤫 Insider: Rockstar sent reminders to actors — no talking about GTA 6 until release
James Jarvis, host of the GTA VI O'Clock podcast, shared this quote:
We would like to remind everyone to please remember your NDA. The date you may announce your involvement is still November 19th.
The warning went out after Stephen Root was the first to confirm he's in the project. He plays Bryan Heider.
Awkward.
🗓 Only TWO months left until GTA 6
The moment we've all been waiting for is almost here!
❤20
Signed Nikita
Showing the 12 most recent of 210 posts we hold for @libertycitynet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@libertycitynet edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LibertyCity.Net” (@libertycitynet), 54,340 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libertycitynet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
