Channel
@liberkong
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
877subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001352181814 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liberkong |
| Created | 19 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liberkong |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 877 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 878 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 878 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 877 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 31 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
【《君主論》與馬基維利】 《君主論》係一本十六世紀嘅政治哲學鉅作，曾經有人將佢同聖經同資本論並列為影響世界嘅重大書籍。呢本薄薄地嘅小書，原本只係作者馬基維利寄比當時佛羅倫斯統治者Medici家族去搲撈嘅作品。但係書中對政治，道德同權謀近乎大逆不道嘅見解令佢成爲咗一本歷史上最惡名昭著嘅邪書。 當時主流嘅係神學家阿奎那 (Aquinas) 將自然法理論同基督教教義融合嘅道德觀。但喺《君主論》入面，馬基維利對自然法道德觀嘅忽視，甚至可以話佢有意無意咁downplay咗呢個當代主流。 馬基維利指出： 如果你想喺陰險嘅政治世界入面做個好人，你嘅下場一定會非常悲慘。而一個領袖如果想生存落去嘅話，佢一定要學會知道咩時候需要放下道德。 近代哲學家史特勞斯 (Strauss) 曾經稱馬基維利為邪惡嘅導師。喺筆者角度嚟睇，《君主論》裡面固然有好多赤裸裸道破人性嘅難聽論點，但係講到底啲字就死嘅，睇緊本書個人就生嘅，你要點樣理解佢係你自己嘅事。由…
【香港史觀——民族歷史II】 //全文請到呢到閱讀// Website | Instagram | MeWe | Telegram公海 | Twitter | LIHKG
LIBERKONG pinned a photo
【知行合一讀書會📚】 閱讀除咗帶比我哋知識之外，亦會創造空間比我哋去了解從未接觸過嘅概念，係一個體驗新事物同思維激盪嘅機會。 呢幾年嘅社運發展都反映咗光復香港從來都無一條既定嘅formula去做。歷史可以借鑑，但我哋所行嘅路注定同前人唔同，必須不斷思考、不斷探索，繼尋找所有重光嘅可能性。 “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.” - Thucydides 要到達我地嘅應許之地，首先要搵到前面條路先。就讓書本作我地嘅指南針，撥開眼前迷霧繼續前進。知行合一以行動實踐思想，思想革新以知識重新建構我地嘅未來。 所以我哋將會舉行第一次F2F讀書會，透過思想交流互相啟發。 —————————————————— 📚【拋磚引玉】…
【香港史觀——歷史教育】 香港歷史教育嘅選材係選擇性同唔持平，並且係故意唔提及事實嘅做法，令事實隨時間而被埋沒。 因為呢種偏頗嘅歷史教育，令大部份香港人無質疑過被灌輸嘅「華夏數千年歷史」嘅真假，產生文明認同嘅傾向錯覺，直接影響身份認同同主權歸屬嘅判斷。 //全文請到呢到閱讀// Website | Instagram | MeWe | Telegram公海 | Twitter | LIHKG
【魚蛋革命 六週年】 魚蛋革命六年過去，當年本土派同一眾義士以行動同武力去進行抗爭，卻因政權而相繼入獄，歷史證明咗當時一眾義士只係行得太前。三年後香港人喺抗爭路上亦一步一步咁蛻變，逐漸跟上步伐。 直至今日，仍然有義士仲未放棄，繼續用唔同方式、一個自己相信嘅方式去打呢場仗，亦都希望大家唔好忘記一眾在囚義士。 依然不斷嘗試用各種方法去光復嘅手足，都係因為相信，先會堅持去行每一條路。所以當大家見到同自己立場相同，但未必接受嘅方式嘅時候，不如試吓思考未來會唔會有機會向呢啲方向發展，或者可能呢一個方法可以推動到成件事呢。 光復香港必須由我哋去完成，香港民族嘅未來就視乎我哋每一個嘅決定。 Website | Instagram | MeWe | Telegram公海 | Twitter | LIHKG
【香港史觀——民族歷史】 香港嘅歷史，其實應該由香港同鄰近地域嘅百越歷史開始，而唔係華夏族侵略者嘅歷史開始。 //全文請到呢到閱讀// Website | Instagram | MeWe | Telegram公海 | Twitter | LIHKG
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @liberkong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,115,724 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@liberkong named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LIBERKONG” (@liberkong), 877 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liberkong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.