Without any doubt, I can say BJP and RSS have done more damage to Hinduism internally than Congress and Muslims have done externally
❤🔥3👍1

Channel
@liberalhindu_hu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
358subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002298360181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liberalhindu_hu |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liberalhindu_hu |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 358 | -1 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 359 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 360 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:23 | 362 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 366 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 367 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 367 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 6 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 16.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Without any doubt, I can say BJP and RSS have done more damage to Hinduism internally than Congress and Muslims have done externally
❤🔥3👍1
Meet Divyansh Gautam aka Vibhu Gautam, abusing Indian Army and Delhi Police at CJP protests. Name: Divyansh Gautam Email: [email protected] Insta id: @chii_yar_vibhu Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vibhu.gautam.378 Mobile: +918595647410 ADDRESS : D/O VIJAY KUMAR HOUSE N0- 14 JANGPURA ROAD BHOGAL JUNGPURA JANGPURA DEFENCE COLONY SOUTH DELHI DELHI 110014
👏4
RAF sources say their personnel were attacked first — pelted with shoes, bottles, and stones, leaving an officer with a head injury — before any lathi charge. But online, it's being twisted into 'RAF attacked, protesters retaliated with stones.' Don't fall for the flipped narrative. Some online narratives have reversed this sequence.
Photo, posted without a caption
Rohit with Gill to English today @ Lord's
😭😂😂
so ‘ntaḥsarasy urubalena gṛhīta ārto, dṛṣṭvā garutmati hariṃ kha upāttacakram utkṣipya sāmbujakaraṃ giram āha kṛcchrāt, nārāyaṇākhilaguro bhagavan namas te Seized within the lake by a thing of enormous strength, in agony, seeing Hari in the sky on the back of Garuḍa, his eagle, with his discus raised, he lifted his trunk with a lotus still in it and spoke this word in his pain: Nārāyaṇa, teacher of all, Bhagavān, ho…
❤1👎1
What are the views of u all on rajnikant in politics?
Video, posted without a caption
❤2🤣1
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @liberalhindu_hu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liberal Hindu ࿗” (@liberalhindu_hu), 358 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liberalhindu_hu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.