Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

***

@lfAFN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002470179653
TypeChannel
Username@lfAFN
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 22 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lfAFN

Growth

2211 Aug 2026, 18:01 — 22 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 00:12 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 18:0112 Aug 2026, 00:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:1222no change
11 Aug 2026, 18:0122first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊2735.5%
🍓1823.7%
🐳1823.7%
💊1215.8%
👀11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2025 to 21 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lfAFN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 March 2025 to 21 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2025, 19:27 UTC221 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

( 🍒: #𝐄𝐢𝐠𝐢_𝐍𝐂 ) . . ‽ ─────────────── - ситуация из ненавиделок если что . #𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨_𝐍𝐂 #𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭_𝐍𝐂

🍓2🕊2

30 Mar 2025, 15:06 UTC241 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#𝒩avia🌟 » Те кто отписался от инфо знайте,героев нужно знать в лицо

🕊7

30 Mar 2025, 12:31 UTC259 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#𝒩avia🌟 »И-так, новости о предстоящей Нью эре 1. Будет создана карта города и добавлены новые локации в сюжете 😜😜😜 2. Добавлены новые фд, а какие пока гадайте 3. Мы вновь начнем делать репосты и прочее сотрудничество с союзами 😉

🕊4🍓1

27 Mar 2025, 16:29 UTC191 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#𝒩avia🌟 » рк на пост с Нью эрой если что

🕊1

27 Mar 2025, 16:24 UTC198 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#𝒩avia🌟 » Давайте вы 20 рк ,а мы вновь начинаем делать репосты союзов Их никто не наберёт поэтому поебать

🍓8🐳3💊3🕊1

27 Mar 2025, 16:21 UTC908 views29 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ❌❌🎀fonia 🎀ew 🎀ra 🤍 ...🌟 ❌❌❌❌❌🌟🌟 ⌨ 🤩27.03-👻.👻 ;;

🐳13🍓7💊6🕊2👀1

24 Mar 2025, 12:44 UTC148 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩 А ʙᴏᴛ и иᴛᴏᴦи дᴀннᴏᴦᴏ инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙᴀ дᴧя ᴄᴏюɜниᴋᴏʙ! Мы дуʍᴀᴇʍ, чᴛᴏ ᴛы ᴨᴏхᴏж нᴀ… 🤍𝒜𝒻𝑜𝓃𝒾𝒶 – Киᴛᴄун϶🤍 ────────────────── 🤍Ты – хиᴛᴩый и ᴦᴩᴀциᴏɜный дух-ᴧиᴄᴀ, ʍᴀᴄᴛᴇᴩ иᴧᴧюɜий и ɜᴀᴦᴀдᴏᴋ. Ты уʍᴇᴇɯь ᴏчᴀᴩᴏʙыʙᴀᴛь и ᴏбʍᴀныʙᴀᴛь, нᴏ нᴇ иɜ ɜᴧᴏᴦᴏ уʍыᴄᴧᴀ, ᴀ ᴩᴀди ʙᴇᴄᴇᴧья и иᴄᴨыᴛᴀния ᴏᴋᴩужᴀющих. Ты ʙидиɯь ᴧюдᴇй нᴀᴄᴋʙᴏɜь и ɜнᴀᴇɯь, ᴋᴀᴋ иᴄᴨᴏᴧьɜᴏʙᴀᴛь их ᴄᴧᴀбᴏᴄᴛи. Однᴀᴋᴏ дᴀжᴇ ᴋиᴛᴄун϶ ᴨᴏᴩᴏй ᴏᴛᴋᴩыʙᴀюᴛ ᴄʙᴏю иᴄᴛинную дуɯу ᴛᴇʍ, ᴋᴛᴏ дᴇй

🕊1

24 Mar 2025, 05:41 UTC190 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

#vdAFN Поддержать проект в соц сетях.

💊3

22 Mar 2025, 17:10 UTC112 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❤🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 ❌❌❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ ❌ Номер 🟥 При желании невеста и жених раскрывают свои роли в флуде. Спасибо за участие 🟥

🕊2

22 Mar 2025, 17:09 UTC103 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ Номер 🟥 Спасибо за игру!

🕊1

22 Mar 2025, 17:05 UTC103 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ 🟥.Возможная глубина человеческих чувств, на которые мы способны в тех или иных условия, которые мы скорее всего никогда не переживем. Величина человеческого разума и личности, которая раскрывается, к несчастью, обычно только от большого горя или боли. Музыка, как невероятно яркое проявление этих самых человеческих чувств, которые я не могу прожить и испытать иначе. (графоман чееек)  🟥. 5. Происшествия в ж

🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lfAFN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 577,541 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“***” (@lfAFN), 22 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lfAFN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.