Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝙇𝙀𝙑𝙄𝘼𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙎

@leviatnans_69

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002478411708
TypeChannel
Username@leviatnans_69
DescriptionСᴋᴀжи ᴛы ᴧюбиɯь ᴄᴋᴏᴩᴏᴄᴛь?) Владелец - @Anko_69_97 Прекрасные жены - @sebig_kf
Created19 September 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/leviatnans_69

Growth

629 Aug 2026, 17:32 — 62 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:16 — 62 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:3210 Aug 2026, 04:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:1662no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:3262first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 19 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
225.0%
🕊225.0%
🥰225.0%
❤‍🔥112.5%
💋112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2024 to 22 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2024, 20:00 UTCviews —

𝙇𝙀𝙑𝙄𝘼𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙎 pinned «Добрый вечер,или не добрый. К содержанию,у владельца этого канала слетел акк,и нет возможности его вернуть. Думаю вы принимаете к чем это ведёт,а именно к закрытию. Со всеми рады были закончить союз, вполне возможно что мы вновь откроемся, но зависит это лишь…»

22 Oct 2024, 19:59 UTC≈2,110 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Добрый вечер,или не добрый. К содержанию,у владельца этого канала слетел акк,и нет возможности его вернуть. Думаю вы принимаете к чем это ведёт,а именно к закрытию. Со всеми рады были закончить союз, вполне возможно что мы вновь откроемся, но зависит это лишь от влд. СОЮЗЫ РАЗРЫВАЮТСЯ. (патент за нами)

💋1

Signed [🕷️]

28 Sept 2024, 19:23 UTC≈2,020 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝘼𝙉𝙆𝙊 : СЕМЬЯ, БИЧЕСКИЕ, ВИРАГО, СОУЛ РИВЕРС 𝙅𝘼𝙔 : РАВАНА 𝙃𝘼𝙎𝙏𝙔 : 𝘿𝘼𝙑𝙄𝙎 : МИОСЫ 𝙆𝙄𝙍𝙊 : МАМОРИ, ЮНИТ, МИАМОР, ОПУСТОШИТЕЛИ, ЧИКАТИЛО, БРИСК КЛАБ

2🥰2❤‍🔥1🕊1

Signed Л̷Ю̷Ц̷И̷Ф̷Е̷Р̷

28 Sept 2024, 19:19 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️ Lvf Под левиафанами Принадлежу Левиафанам ⁵⁶⁷ ⁶⁹ В ник или био, копируется при нажатии.

Signed Л̷Ю̷Ц̷И̷Ф̷Е̷Р̷

28 Sept 2024, 19:15 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️ 𝖮𝖶𝖭𝖤𝖱 - 𝗔𝗡𝗞𝗢 (набор на союзы, закрыт) 𝖢𝖱𝖤𝖠𝖳𝖨𝖵𝖤 𝖠𝖣𝖬𝖨𝖭 - 𝖠𝖣𝖬𝖨𝖭 𝖢𝖧𝖠𝖳 - 𝖴𝖭𝖨𝖮𝖭𝖲 : 𝗔𝗡𝗞𝗢, 𝗝𝗔𝗬, 𝗛𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗬, 𝗗𝗔𝗩𝗜𝗦(набор закрыт),𝗞𝗜𝗥𝗢

Signed Л̷Ю̷Ц̷И̷Ф̷Е̷Р̷

28 Sept 2024, 19:12 UTC912 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️ Жены – Суккубы Принцессы – Братья – Сëстры – Кримсон Дети – Кенты — Миосы Собачки —

🕊1

Signed Л̷Ю̷Ц̷И̷Ф̷Е̷Р̷

28 Sept 2024, 19:10 UTC843 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️ 𝖱𝖴𝖫𝖤𝖲 𝖴𝖭𝖨𝖮𝖭 𝖱𝖴𝖫𝖤𝖲 𝖢𝖧𝖠𝖳 𝖴𝖭𝖨𝖮𝖭 𝖲𝖧𝖤𝖤𝖳𝖲 𝖢𝖱𝖠𝖲𝖧 𝖲𝖧𝖤𝖤𝖳 𝖥𝖠𝖬𝖨𝖫𝖸 𝖨𝖭𝖨𝖳𝖨𝖠𝖫𝖲 𝖠𝖣𝖬𝖨𝖭𝖨𝖲𝖳𝖱𝖠𝖳𝖨𝖮𝖭 𝖯𝖠𝖳𝖤𝖭𝖳 𝖠𝖱𝖢𝖧𝖨𝖵𝖤 БОТ - @Amaryllis_admin_bot

Signed Л̷Ю̷Ц̷И̷Ф̷Е̷Р̷

28 Sept 2024, 19:06 UTC782 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️ ᴨᴀᴛᴇнᴛ нᴀ нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ «𝙇𝙀𝙑𝙄𝘼𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙎». ᴄ ϶ᴛᴏᴦᴏ дня, нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ «𝙇𝙀𝙑𝙄𝘼𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙎» ᴨᴩинᴀдᴧᴇжиᴛ иᴄᴋᴧючᴇнᴏ нᴀɯᴇй конференции – @leviatnans_69 ᴇᴄᴧи ʍы ɜᴀʍᴇᴛиʍ ᴛᴀᴋᴏᴇ жᴇ нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ у дᴩуᴦᴏᴦᴏ ᴋᴧᴀнᴀ/ᴄᴇʍьи, иʍᴇᴇʍ ᴨᴏᴧнᴏᴇ ᴨᴩᴀʙᴏ нᴀᴄᴛᴏяᴛь нᴀ ᴇᴦᴏ ᴄʍᴇнᴇ. ɜᴀᴨᴀнᴛᴇнᴏʙᴀнᴏ - 19.09.24

Signed Л̷Ю̷Ц̷И̷Ф̷Е̷Р̷

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @leviatnans_69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,247,547 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙇𝙀𝙑𝙄𝘼𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙎” (@leviatnans_69), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leviatnans_69.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.