2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 184–185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 06:54
184
-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:16
185
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
403.1%
avg views ÷ 184 subscribers
Avg views / post
742
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
20 (24 June 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
9,641
Reactions total
295
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 10s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
421 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
113
26.8%
🔥
108
25.7%
custom 5215538598970929961
42
9.98%
👍
29
6.89%
custom 6325476444541552410
18
4.28%
👏
16
3.80%
🥰
16
3.80%
custom 6325762240255362536
11
2.61%
custom 6325331270351979944
8
1.90%
custom 6325841675675502303
8
1.90%
👀
8
1.90%
custom 6325767939676964769
7
1.66%
❤🔥
7
1.66%
custom 6327578929817192652
6
1.43%
🙏
6
1.43%
🤔
6
1.43%
custom 6325710477309511186
4
0.95%
⚡
4
0.95%
custom 6327965167636186577
3
0.713%
🤬
1
0.238%
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
7,850
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
145
over 18 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJ3E2YH
1
22 July 2026
22 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Салют! 🤙
С вами Даня.
Прозвища как такового нет. Называют иногда Даныло.
Музыку любил всегда, предпочтений как таковых нет, меломан, но иногда (в зависимости от настроения) слушаю определенный жанр.
С юных лет родители пытались сделать так, чтобы я занимался в музыкальной школе на пианино, но бросил ее спустя 3 года. Я вообще не планировал становиться каким-то музыкантом и что-то делать.
Но в 2014 году музыкальное…
Привет, меня зовут Вася. 🫰Прозвище с детства Веда. Можно подумать что это как то связано с буддизмом, но на самом деле с фамилией - Веденьев. 🙃
Если вам интересно именно о музыке, то я в ней с детства. Детский образцовый народный ансамбль, музыкальные кружки в школе, свои проекты с подросткового возраста.
Кстати, о "своих проектах". Конечно же это группы с друзьями. Ещё в далёком 2014 мы собрали первый состав нашей…
📢 Три трека - не предел!
Мы не сидим на месте, поэтому представляем вам следующий релиз группы «Давай попробуем»!
Делайте пресейвы, чтобы услышать релиз первым! 😉
Ловите небольшой отрывок, релиз будет горячим. 🔥
Всем привет 👋 На связи Захар. Расскажу немного о себе.
Прозвище Захар досталось мне по наследству от бати — его так звали все. В юности я только так и представлялся, впоследствии стал чаще ассоциировать себя больше с этим прозвищем, чем с именем. Многие годами думали, что меня реально так зовут.
Моя первая группа собралась из дворовых ребят в Жулебино. С названиями всегда было туго, поэтому мы назвались BMW (Bloody…
Всем привет! 👋
Успели послушать наш первый релиз?
Делитесь своими впечатлениями в комментариях!
За конструктивную критику мы будем очень благодарны. Все комментарии читаем и принимаем во внимание.
P.s. Те, кто еще не слушал, обязательно послушайте! 😉
Результаты конкурса: 🥳
Так как одним из обязательных условий был пресейв нашего релиза, мы провели ручную проверку и были выявлены следующие победители:
@rolexrolexx
@atlesph
@yarrr1307
Победителям напишем в личные сообщения для доставки приза.
Первый мини-альбом группы «Давай попробуем» уже в сети! 🔥
«Мысли перед сном» — это три трека на стыке рока, рэпа и драм-н-бэйса. Три истории о том, что происходит в голове, когда гаснет свет и город засыпает.
Уже доступно в Яндекс Музыке и VK. На остальных площадках релиз появится чуть позже.
Нажимай и слушай!
Слушайте, сохраняйте в плейлисты и делитесь впечатлениями.
P.S. И да, мы оставим вас наедине с этими тр…
Четвертый сниппет! 🎧
Мы на финишной прямой. EP «Мысли перед сном» совсем скоро появится на площадках 🔥
Если еще не успели — самое время сделать пресейв по ссылке: https://band.link/lxaQC
👉 ТикТок | Инст
Ловите третий сниппет, друзья! 🤘
Градус ожидания растет с каждым днем!
Мы вложили много эмоций в EP "Мысли перед сном" и нам не терпится показать все целиком.
Лучшая поддержка для нас - это ваши пресейвы. Переходите по ссылке и добавляйте грядущий релиз к себе: https://band.link/lxaQC
👉 ТикТок | Инст
Врываемся к вам с новым сниппетом!
Продолжаем погружаться в атмосферу нашего будущего EP 🎸
Оформляйте пресейв, чтобы услышать полную версию первыми: https://band.link/lxaQC
👉 ТикТок | Инст
❤7🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @letstryit_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 548,337 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Давай попробуем” (@letstryit_official), 184 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/letstryit_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
