Achievement Unlocked: Alpha caller! 🐺 X-Man first posted by @letsprintchannel has since been posted by 10+ callers in the network. 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Auto-buy and sell calls like this through SpyDefi Filters!

Channel
LETS PRINT 💵
@letsprintchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
431subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001971186167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @letsprintchannel |
| Description | Money money money 💰 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/letsprintchannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 431 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 431 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.1%
- avg views ÷ 431 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 60.6
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,212 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 49
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 97
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
0x7fc4f8536fb903dc1e3296d5ed4860f3f491d1cc
low cap high risk plays
DFbQSEBBxecWbuL59R9yteSw2JbMKCjJpuQd1Zxzpump Also this
https://x.com/i/status/2085002354978672804
This meme is backed by a globally recognized brand and a fan art culture that has remained active on Reddit for over a decade, with new artwork still being created by the community today. I see it as a piece of internet culture that has stood the test of time. Goal is to celebrate that culture and spread it together as a community. This has never been about a personal launch - it has always been about building a mis…
@ponyfanclub_rh
0x1ec71ce6b6a77f47743af42c8c7e561764227777
gonna have a RH play
https://x.com/ernest0424/status/2084688641608290572
G6FgMeojfzoqBrSNpUXeXzg1gGQf2vvkYEAcvdfopump 8k
X-Man [XMAN] 🪶Buy! 🤩🤩🤩🤩 💀| 0.026 ETH ($49.83) 💀| Got: 2,913,082 XMAN 💀| Holders: 71 💀| MC: $17,103 💀| Pool: flap_v5 💀| Buyer | Txn 💀| Telegram 💀Dex
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @letsprintchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,038,571 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LETS PRINT 💵” (@letsprintchannel), 431 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/letsprintchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.