Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for стол

Channel

стол

@lestol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474441212
TypeChannel
Username@lestol
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lestol

Growth

4951509 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51 subscribers9 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:0751+2
10 Aug 2026, 12:0149no change
9 Aug 2026, 20:3149first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.4%
avg views ÷ 51 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
36.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 December 20252 August 2026)
Views total41
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9339.1%
😁4619.3%
💔239.66%
🎄156.30%
😱125.04%
🔥114.62%
🙏62.52%
52.10%
🌚52.10%
💯41.68%
😢41.68%
❤‍🔥31.26%
🤩31.26%
👍20.84%
🤔20.84%
10.42%
👌10.42%
👏10.42%
🤯10.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lestol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 December 2025 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC41 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Однажды моя бывшая жена ушла в горы и не вернулась. Она была сильной женщиной, поэтому я за неё не волновался, но немного всё-таки волновался. Я решил, что это хорошая возможность начать больше общаться с детьми, и забрал их из квартиры бывшей жены, от которой у меня были ключи. Что делать дальше с детьми я не знал, поэтому решил съездить с ними в горы и заодно поискать там жену. Дети в горы идти не хотели, пришлось

7😁5🤔2💯1

19 May 2026, 21:43 UTC122 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

- Стой, стой. Переключи обратно. - Че там? - Верни там, где про пустыню было. Экран, на секунду моргнув, переключился обратно на выпуск новостей. - Во, гляди, вот же стоит, видишь? - Чё? - Ну вон, там, треугольный. Фёдор прищурился и действительно заметил в самом центре экрана непонятное треугольные существо с как будто приклеенным человеческим лицом и торчащими во все стороны высоковольтными проводами вместо конечно

😱642

15 Apr 2026, 22:25 UTC157 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В Синем городе очень сложно было существовать без буквы Q. Здесь часто происходили трагические события, землетрясения или эпидемии, а так как официальный язык для коммуникаций был английским, то приходилось всё время переписываться о таких вещах, как earthQuake или Quarantine. По несчастливой случайности у Кинила на клавиатуре была сцарапана палочка с буквы Q, поэтому пользоваться этой буквой он не мог, и полезной и

😢4😱21🔥1

21 Feb 2026, 12:05 UTC156 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

может это тоже на конкурс отправлю

3😁2👌1

21 Feb 2026, 11:58 UTC149 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Отправил этот рассказ на конкурс, но, кажется, никуда не прошёл. Нужно было, чтобы в рассказе: ◦ Кто-нибудь что-нибудь исследовал; ◦ Летали мухи; ◦ Женщина отказывалась выходить замуж. Про мух идея у меня уже была, женщина тоже участвовала, остальное пришлось притянуть за уши. Получилось, как по мне, ну так. Сложно так писать, как будто кто-то за спиной стоит и заглядывает. Запятые проверяет, сколько раз один и тот

💔12

31 Jan 2026, 20:09 UTC168 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Однажды утром Анатолий проснулся от необычного сна. Мухи снова просили имени, однако странно было другое. На этот раз во сне присутствовала малоизвестная, но известная Анатолию певица. Пела она неважно, но Анатолию нравилось не это. Певица исследовала содержимое холодильника у Анатолия на кухне, разговаривая при этом с мухами. Было не очень слышно, что она говорит, так как на кухне было темно, а за окном - ночь. Ана

9

20 Jan 2026, 22:22 UTC133 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Так получилось, что у Анатолия в какой-то момент закончился внутренний смысл. Раньше смысла было с достатком, через край даже. Любой случайный объект мог стать сосудом для анатолиевого смысла, да так, что вокруг него мог выстроиться целый новый мир со своими историями и персонажами. Теперь же всего этого не было: ложка была ложкой, вилка - вилкой, а мёртвая муха на окне даже не имела имени, хотя и просила. Теперь, ч

💔11🔥3

1 Jan 2026, 17:01 UTC161 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Хотя давайте проведём опрос общественного мнения

  1. Давай пиши дальше про рыбликов17%
  2. Давай пиши то что раньше писал, вот это вот про Анатолия17%
  3. Давай пиши загадочные отчёты о нераскрытых делах9%
  4. Ой да пиши что хочешь, твой же канал ❤️70%
  5. Я здесь только для сортировки реакций22%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jan 2026, 16:55 UTC136 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ну ладно, повеселились с рыбликами да и хватит. Год уже новый как-никак, с чем вас и поздравляю.

🎄121

31 Dec 2025, 14:16 UTC131 views12 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Один рыблик очень любил дарить подарки. Он если видел другого рыблика, то сразу с земли поднимал палку или камушек, и ему дарил. Но другие рыблики обычно не знали что делать с такими подарками, и клали их обратно на землю. А потом кто-то их опять дарил иногда. Другой рыблик очень любил праздники. Он всегда наряжал дерево на праздник. И он так говорил, что сегодня праздник, мог сказать что завтра уже тоже праздник и

9🎄3

30 Dec 2025, 19:21 UTC107 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

У одного рыблика была большая шляпа, красивая. В ней было восемь перьев, по одному на каждый день недели, и одно особенное. Он каждый день семь перьев местами менял, а восьмое не менял никогда. Все другие рыблики говорили ах какая шляпа, иногда между собой. Однажды рыблик положил шляпу на полку и уехал далеко. А шляпа осталась. Ещё один рыблик очень любил печь булочки, но делать это не умел совсем. Он просто сжигал

7🙏5

29 Dec 2025, 21:34 UTC94 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Другой рыблик любил смотреть в бинокль. Он видел очень далеко и даже за морем то что тоже видел. Один раз он увидел рыблика, который смотрел в телескоп. Рыблик, который смотрел в бинокль, думал, что рыблик посмотрит в телескоп на него, но рыблик смотрел в телескоп только на небо, потому что хотел видеть звезды, но запутался и делал это днём, поэтому ничего не увидел. А один рыблик спрыгнул с этажерки. И ничего не сл

11

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lestol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jan 2026, 17:01 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Хотя давайте проведём опрос общественного мнения

  1. Давай пиши дальше про рыбликов17%
  2. Давай пиши то что раньше писал, вот это вот про Анатолия17%
  3. Давай пиши загадочные отчёты о нераскрытых делах9%
  4. Ой да пиши что хочешь, твой же канал ❤️70%
  5. Я здесь только для сортировки реакций22%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,227,687 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“стол” (@lestol), 51 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lestol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.