Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лесенка

Channel

Лесенка

@lesenkarisyet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

231subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002434626342
TypeChannel
Username@lesenkarisyet
DescriptionРисули и другие творческие моменты
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lesenkarisyet

Growth

2316 Aug 2026, 22:38 — 231 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:48 — 231 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:387 Aug 2026, 02:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230–232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:48231no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:38231first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.0%
avg views ÷ 231 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (23 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,181
Reactions total279
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
403
Videos
2
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

516 reactions across 12 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 540004031801381797711422.1%
custom 529875837492449708410019.4%
custom 54001836238926143005711.0%
custom 5359840686843644701326.20%
305.81%
🔥295.62%
custom 5235981754241665594224.26%
custom 5413700100721496500183.49%
custom 5413700354124564367163.10%
custom 5415877954083242746142.71%
custom 5442733632965863838142.71%
custom 5399989512845672189122.33%
custom 5278767853372192049112.13%
custom 5449507938852951506112.13%
custom 526966382407977799391.74%
custom 539767632076945974071.36%
🌚50.969%
custom 544287536688663660140.775%
💘40.775%
custom 530124019600668373820.388%
4 further kinds50.969%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 516reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 12 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lesenkarisyet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC86 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Балуюсь с лассо и текстурными кистями ч.3

custom 544273363296586383812custom 54158779540832427465💘1custom 52696638240797779931custom 54137001007214965001

5 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC106 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Балуюсь с лассо и текстурными кистями ч.2

custom 541370035412456436716custom 54158779540832427465custom 54427336329658638382🌚1🔥1custom 52696638240797779931

4 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC155 views49 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Балуюсь с лассо и текстурными кистями ч.1

custom 523598175424166559420custom 535984068684364470111custom 541370010072149650086💘2🌚1custom 52696638240797779931

30 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC191 views43 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

design workout Я обновила реакции, чекайте

custom 535984068684364470121custom 54137001007214965009custom 52696638240797779936custom 54158779540832427464custom 52359817542416655942🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC172 views42 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

#18

custom 529875837492449708422custom 540018362389261430010custom 52787678533721920496🔥3🌚1

22 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC237 views39 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нашла в тиктоке художницу, украла (с разрешения) такого хорошенького ангелочка 🤩 Скоро приду в себя и возобновлю работу над анимацией, не теряйте, если что

custom 540004031801381797723custom 54001836238926143008🔥4custom 52787678533721920493🌚1

19 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC234 views60 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

План был сделать чиловое, привычное и легкое, чтобы результат стопроцентно оправдал ожидания. План провалился. Я рисовала 18 часов и так и не придумала, как собрать из этого что-то целостное

custom 540004031801381797732custom 529875837492449708414custom 540018362389261430082🍓1🔥1🦄1custom 52243101419600737011

8 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC271 views44 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 540004031801381797718custom 529875837492449708413custom 540018362389261430082🍓1💘1🔥1

3 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC309 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 529875837492449708427🔥15custom 540018362389261430010custom 54000403180138179774

2 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC276 views41 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54000403180138179771812custom 54001836238926143006custom 54428753668866366014👍1

26 Jun 2026, 07:01 UTC321 views41 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

#17 Устаревший максимализм

custom 540004031801381797717custom 539998951284567218912custom 540018362389261430063🔥2custom 53012401960066837381

23 Jun 2026, 11:00 UTC285 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 529875837492449708424custom 544950793885295150611custom 539767632076945974075custom 52787678533721920492custom 54000403180138179772🌚1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @lesenkarisyet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 777,078 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лесенка” (@lesenkarisyet), 231 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lesenkarisyet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.