Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LSBSL

Channel

LSBSL

@lesbianochka2013

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

158subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002273103341
TypeChannel
Username@lesbianochka2013
Created21 January 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lesbianochka2013

Growth

158165161.57 August 2026 — 165 subscribers8 August 2026 — 165 subscribers14 August 2026 — 161 subscribers21 August 2026 — 159 subscribers28 August 2026 — 158 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 157–166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 08:53158-1
21 Aug 2026, 06:38159-2
14 Aug 2026, 15:17161-4
8 Aug 2026, 16:02165no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:38165first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 21 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

493 reactions across 5 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 532328996110389811719038.5%
custom 52830561849437273505010.1%
custom 5438473274516319241459.13%
custom 5438237970438040224448.92%
💘397.91%
🆒326.49%
custom 5237720739255172149224.46%
custom 5393499323340190183183.65%
💔122.43%
custom 523129405943108819091.83%
custom 526074980843547948181.62%
71.42%
custom 544313803849651884861.22%
🔥61.22%
🕊51.01%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 20 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 7 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lesbianochka2013. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2025 to 20 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Oct 2025, 12:56 UTC≈4,850 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

кто не зайдет будет жестоко наказан в аду

7

Signed варюзя ;3

31 Aug 2025, 21:19 UTC≈6,790 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В честь 1 сентября всем быть на линейке школы лесбиянок в 8.00

💔11🔥6🕊5💘1🆒1

Signed Sj🐜

26 Jan 2025, 15:50 UTC≈12,800 views112 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

союзы 🖤Союзы 0+🖤 Актив + рп 👼Репосты, посты держатся 6 часов👼 👼Рп проводится по удобному для админа времени👼 👼Можем не заключить союз по разным причинам👼 👼Причину об разрыве союза можем не говорить👼 👼В чаты союзников не вступаем👼 50+ с кн меньше не заключаем Рп то что под хештегом #LSBSLrp

custom 532328996110389811736custom 543847327451631924120custom 543823797043804022419custom 52377207392551721499custom 52830561849437273507custom 53934993233401901836🆒5custom 52312940594310881905

26 Jan 2025, 15:50 UTC≈13,900 views153 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Чат "школа лесбиянок" нуждается в учителях/администрации для чата, администрации для канала По всем вопросам писать @Kqlxudho

custom 532328996110389811772💘21custom 528305618494372735018custom 543823797043804022411custom 543847327451631924111custom 54431380384965188486🆒5custom 53934993233401901835

26 Jan 2025, 15:50 UTC≈11,800 views197 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 💋 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 😊😊😘🤣🤣😊😊🤣💐 Ссылка на чат Правила школы инициалы патент МемЛесб 😊 архив boost 😍 наш чат является не типичным вирт чатом. в "школе" проводятся реальные уроки лесбиянства. добро пожаловать) обратите внимание что это именно чат, а не кф.

custom 532328996110389811782custom 528305618494372735025🆒21custom 543823797043804022414custom 543847327451631924114💘13custom 523772073925517214913custom 52607498084354794818

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lesbianochka2013. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LSBSL” (@lesbianochka2013), 158 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lesbianochka2013.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.