Скетч✝️🤩
custom 546985145088241213513custom 52130678374295499688custom 54001569177859626187

Channel
@leramarabour
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
323subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002441089060 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leramarabour |
| Description | 👋🏻Я Лера Марабу, татуировщица из Казани (Ереван- ждите осенью!) Делаю татуировки вот уже 8 лет Заходи в инстаграм, чтобы посмотреть портфолио с работами: https://instagram.com/marabou_tattoo?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= Личка @MarabouTattoo |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leramarabour |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 323 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 323 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (9 July 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,753 |
| Reactions total | 188 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
310 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5417893882882978858 | 81 | 26.1% | |
| custom 5400156917785962618 | 48 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5469851450882412135 | 45 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5249205894121534423 | 43 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5402506303551579918 | 23 | 7.42% | |
| custom 5213067837429549968 | 22 | 7.10% | |
| custom 5242557435071201667 | 16 | 5.16% | |
| custom 5271803701340706125 | 15 | 4.84% | |
| custom 5366510023730018763 | 11 | 3.55% | |
| custom 5289481791025995317 | 6 | 1.94% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Скетч✝️🤩
custom 546985145088241213513custom 52130678374295499688custom 54001569177859626187
Ооочень нравится динамика этой работы, как она заворачивается по плечику🐬
custom 541789388288297885810custom 52894817910259953176custom 54001569177859626183
Обычно мы с клиентами всегда обговариваем заранее эскиз, который будем делать, но в этот раз получилось иначе) Кристина- гостья из Нижневартовска -уже на месте попросила посмотреть мои свободные эскизы Мы уже почти остановились на одном из них, как вдруг я вспомнила и про рисунки из своего скетчбука- там оказался жабий, который попал точно в цель) Вот так спортанно перенеслась на кожу Кристины самая первая картинка…
custom 541789388288297885818custom 52425574350712016677custom 54001569177859626183
Такую малютку-заживчика поймала Делали в мае 2025 Розовый прям идеальный▫️
custom 541789388288297885821custom 52718037013407061258custom 54001569177859626185
Казань, осталось всего 10 свободных дат в августе до моего переезда (я не оставляю себе выходных вообще, чтобы вас побольше принять) Так что пишите!💌 @MarabouTattoo
custom 536651002373001876311custom 54025063035515799188custom 54001569177859626184
Нетипичная для меня работа, но как же отдыхает мозг на таких цветочных проектах🦋 Делаешь листочек, потом лепесточек... и опять листочек-лепесточек... 3 дня подряд работали и сделали круговой рукав На плече работа не моя
custom 541789388288297885818custom 52492058941215344235custom 54001569177859626183
The derevnya
custom 524920589412153442312custom 52425574350712016679custom 54698514508824121356custom 54001569177859626183
Кстати на тик ток подписывайтесь!) я сюда не весь контент дублирую
custom 54698514508824121356custom 54001569177859626184
Жесткий хайп в тик токе🎻 Этот пост принес мне +1 000 новых подписчиков и кучу приятных комментариев Но вот момент! Пара человек написали с просьбой скинуть эскизы моих татуировок, которые им понравились Я к такому отношусь конечно же негативно, и либо отказываю, либо просто игнорирую, так как считаю это неуважением к тем клиентам, для которых рисовались проекты В этом и значение слова "индивидуальный"- платя за та…
custom 54001569177859626189custom 54025063035515799188custom 52718037013407061257custom 54178938828829788581
Мои маленькие...🐱 Очень люблю такие совпадения Интересно сколько людей в Казани приходили ко мне за все эти 8 лет
custom 524920589412153442326custom 521306783742954996814custom 54698514508824121358custom 54001569177859626185
Опааа, у меня тоже есть птички
custom 541789388288297885813custom 546985145088241213512custom 54025063035515799187custom 54001569177859626182
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @leramarabour. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 714,064 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марабу🍧 Тату Казань • Ереван” (@leramarabour), 323 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leramarabour.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.