трейдос с одной художницей из инсты #edwardelric | #fma
custom 539985532088749412427custom 540443919774858962513custom 526494656700930069211custom 52652671691380780552custom 52672227708271617921

Channel
@leondafma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
256subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002170695862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leondafma |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leondafma |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 256 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 257 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (8 December 2025 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 103 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,014 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5399855320887494124 | 226 | 22.3% | |
| custom 5267001129039851813 | 209 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5411630729643724977 | 170 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5265267169138078055 | 105 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5404439197748589625 | 94 | 9.27% | |
| custom 5267222770827161792 | 70 | 6.90% | |
| custom 5262684777101687381 | 59 | 5.82% | |
| custom 5264946567009300692 | 57 | 5.62% | |
| custom 5404399001149671643 | 24 | 2.37% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,014reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leondafma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2025 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
трейдос с одной художницей из инсты #edwardelric | #fma
custom 539985532088749412427custom 540443919774858962513custom 526494656700930069211custom 52652671691380780552custom 52672227708271617921
https://t.me/leondacommis кто хотел у меня заказать коммишку — это для вас. Здесь полный прайс, да и не только в стилистике алхимика.
custom 539985532088749412412
Posted without readable text
Прикиньте, кстати, я впервые за три года с кем-то погулял, и по совместительству это ещё и мой второй раз в жизни, когда я пересекаюсь с кем-то из другого города (В последний раз такое было 8 лет назад)........ Если в двух словах, то по счастливому стечению обстоятельств @leondafma (Леонда) оказалась в моём городе и мы решили встретиться. Давненько я уже не чувствовал себя настолько тупо со стороны #HigureRoomShitpo…
custom 539985532088749412410custom 52626847771016873818
ну слушайте ,что то в день влюблённых нарисовать викэдов вообще не получилось, из за нехватки какого то вдохновения что-ли , но за то нарисовала мемную пикчу по сюжетке хдддд очень романтично блядь #viced | #fmaoc | #victoria | #edwardelric
custom 526268477710168738146custom 539985532088749412421custom 541163072964372497719custom 54044391977485896254custom 52649465670093006921
03.02 🤨 #edwardelric | #fma
custom 541163072964372497755custom 539985532088749412421custom 526700112903985181320custom 52672227708271617926custom 52649465670093006923custom 54044391977485896253custom 52626847771016873812
беру возможно долгий рест хочу начать всë сначала, а именно с перерисовок моих старых работ, над дизайнами моих персонажей , а также взятие за сюжет Мне очень больно смотреть на своих персонажей, как они выглядят однотипными, даже если у них есть на это причина, меня это не успокаивает
custom 539985532088749412435custom 541163072964372497713custom 526700112903985181312
Channel name was changed to «LEONDA | РЕСТ»
трейд с любимым худом из тамблера @39theonario #fmaoc | #winryrockbell
custom 526526716913807805533custom 526722277082716179214custom 52670011290398518139custom 52626847771016873813custom 52649465670093006923custom 54044391977485896251
аааааа как же я ненавижу делать анимации вы бы зналиии........ это просто занимает очень много времени для меня , даже когда эта анимация на простой слайдшоу..... #animation | #fmaoc | #heied | #victoria | #alfonsheiderich | #edwardelric
custom 526700112903985181333custom 541163072964372497716custom 539985532088749412415custom 54044391977485896256custom 52649465670093006921
🤩 | а вы знали что викэды и анастасия дмитрий почти что схожи отношениями и историей, (ну и внешностью) ???? 😜 — у Виктории есть кое какая королевская дальняя кровь что и у Анастасии — Цель вернуться домой — Эд похож на дмитрия своим повседневным костюмом )) — почти что та же эпоха #fmaoc | #viced | #victoria | #edwardelric
custom 539985532088749412444custom 541163072964372497723custom 526494656700930069220custom 52672227708271617923custom 54044391977485896253
ребятушки;!!ну вот ,этот быстрый, скучный год заканчивается , я хочу сказать спасибо: друзьям, подписчикам, что вы остались со мной и поддерживаете меня до сих пор ,надеюсь в следующем году будет в том же духе и наберу 300 число!! а может даже больше, не знаю, посмотрим)))) В этом году я рисовала довольно мало, 4 арта в месяц, и мне было сложно выбрать кого поставить в этот шаблончик
custom 526700112903985181335custom 541163072964372497717custom 526526716913807805513custom 53998553208874941243custom 52672227708271617922custom 54043990011496716431
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @leondafma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,000,710 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEONDA | РЕСТ” (@leondafma), 256 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leondafma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.