Channel
@leo_bastilia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
289subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001162464276 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leo_bastilia |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leo_bastilia |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 289 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 291 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 292 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:50 | 292 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
518 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 136 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 124 | 23.9% | |
| 👍 | 105 | 20.3% | |
| 😁 | 44 | 8.49% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 3.47% | |
| 🤯 | 18 | 3.47% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 3.09% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 2.90% | |
| 🎉 | 11 | 2.12% | |
| 🥴 | 6 | 1.16% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 0.965% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 0.965% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.579% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.386% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.386% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.386% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.386% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.193% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
О собственной ролевой игре Я всегда думал, что я как будто коровный игрок в модельки, дайте мне правила, я во все поиграю. Мне нужно ездить на хорошие игры от сильных мастеров, и всем мы это мудрое решение рекомендуем. В реальности ключевое для меня — понимание сеттинга и игрового мира, как принято было говорить на ХСах логики мира. Если я ее понимаю, я поиграю хорошо в своей голове, а если это понимание совпадет с …
👍22🔥8❤4👀1
Отчет про макроэкономику на Дюне. Ланс и Торгрим сделали очень крутую модель, в которую прикольно играть в вакууме. Она рассчитана на следующие условия: 1. Все или хотя бы 80% акторов ее хорошо понимают и играют в нее 2. Все или хотя бы 80% акторов руководствуются в основном собственными интересами в этой модели 3. На игре не будет заключено жесткого альянса между кем-то из ключевых игроков (из-за пожизневых договор…
👍16🔥10😱10🥴6❤2🥱2🆒2👌1
Далее, большие молодцы Вер и Никита, как главные организаторы этого выезда. От себя добавлю, что от меня было крайне мало помощи и много гундежа, я был неправ в своем неверии в предложенный выезд и философию. Также с большим удовольствием затусил с клубом Мистраль и их белгородскими корешами, респект, надо еще
❤27👏2
Крайне хорошо поиграл на Дюне в Дюну, крайне доволен командой и тем как сложилась игровая ситуация вокруг нас. На этом фоне остальные вопросы тут малоинтересны, всем спасибо за игру, особенно тем, кто сделал для нас и для Харконеннов так, чтобы Дюна была настоящей Дюной :)
❤26🔥16
Лето и арбалеты
❤22👍8🎉1😁1😎1
В кабаке выработали программу заседания Ландсраада, на случай если будет нечего обсуждать и придется там ролеплеить: 1. С хера ли пончики с нарушением заповедей джихада 2. Какой дерзкий чел придумал называть Рафаэля Коррино падишах-императором 3. Почему Верниусы устраивают битву роботов
🤣18🔥1
Ща подъедем
🔥17😁5❤3
Есть ли желающие поехать со мной на Дюну из СПб (1 место)? Туда в выходные перед игрой обратно с воскресенья на понедельник. думаю ночевать где-то в Твери и не заябываться
Захотел узнать, какой у меня статус в системе фафрелах на Дюне, заглянул в заявку. Обнаружил, что искусство использования полей в джойне полностью утрачено, это где-то там у региональщика в Excel видимо лежит UPD: зато положение в ролевом движении не утрачено, примерно через 40 секунд после поста в личку мастера написали статус
😁28🤯10🔥6👍1
Я понял формулировку, почему меня раздражают БЖЗИ. Ни черта я не хотел убить твоего друга, я хотел тебя убить. Хватит лишать меня агентности, пожалуйста.
❤14💯2👍1💔1
https://t.me/no_code_girl/2878 Александра продолжает травить кабаки
😍3💋1
В целом, год моей жизни ушел на гигантское количество проводов и трубочек.
🔥29🤩16👍2💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @leo_bastilia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЛеоЦарев // #Бастилия” (@leo_bastilia), 289 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leo_bastilia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.