Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лен||Ежевичная Нора⁶¹ˢᑫᵈ

Channel

Лен||Ежевичная Нора⁶¹ˢᑫᵈ

@lensplace

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

372subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001872460795
TypeChannel
Username@lensplace
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lensplace

Growth

3723763747 August 2026 — 376 subscribers7 August 2026 — 373 subscribers14 August 2026 — 372 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 371–377 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:49372-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:22373-3
7 Aug 2026, 03:47376first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 372 subscribers
Avg views / post
80.6
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (6 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total645
Reactions total119
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52354421732053195335824.4%
custom 52312691743905878284518.9%
custom 52446002331863122963113.0%
🔥2610.9%
custom 53326978249727959572510.5%
💘187.56%
custom 5197449425080831947177.14%
custom 5451987535142083446114.62%
😁52.10%
🕊10.42%
🦄10.42%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lensplace. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @karasvdyxovkeVideo

Набор на Ивент: << Хуманизация персонажей из игры !!Five nights at Freddy’s!! >> Всего у нас 25 участников! После окончания набора я создам группу, где будет больше информации о самой хуманизации. Потом каждому участнику в Лс отправлю его персонажа и кину туда ссылку на группу. Все участники будут видны в посте после окончания набора! 👁️ [ Хочу сказать, что в этот раз буду выбирать художников смотря на их стиль и на

custom 52312691743905878282

6 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC26 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сверху ещё вчерашний пост, посмотрите и его тоже, пожалуйста 🥰

custom 52312691743905878284custom 53326978249727959573

6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC38 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🙉🩷 🤵‍♂️🥰 🥺🩷 🙁🩷 👦🤍 😼💅 Ну, и оставшиеся порисульки. Для Violenca, gorelecter, CrownedCrowRow, Diamondjewels506 (все на АФ) ✨ Вообще, рисовала уже чисто для того, чтобы добить красивое число атак и получить ачивку (а последнюю работу вообще выгрузила за 10 минут до конца ивента лол). Ну и ещё мне безумно хотелось поатаковать рандомных персонажей рандомных людей Результатами Артфайта я более, чем довольна. Сделала абсолю

custom 523544217320531953311custom 52312691743905878282custom 52446002331863122962custom 51974494250808319471custom 53326978249727959571custom 54519875351420834461

5 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC61 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌱 Довыкладываю атаки на Артфайт уже после окончания ивента. Месть для ПБ! 🌱 Самая долгая моя работа за весь этот АФ (9,5 часов!). Кайфую от того, как получился фон, но не очень нравится, как вышла героиня. Впрочем, получательнице зашло, а это самое главное 🌿❤ Спасибо, что атаковала меня! Твой рисунок с Арлейн мой любимый. Обязательно сразимся в следующем году! ❤️ Завтра выложу оставшиеся рисунки, чтобы не спамить пос

custom 52354421732053195337custom 52312691743905878285custom 52446002331863122965💘3custom 51974494250808319471custom 53326978249727959571custom 54519875351420834461

4 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC42 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lazygrayzelPhoto

ПО МНОГОЧИСЛЕННЫМ ПРОСЬБАМ - НОВАЯ, ТРЕТЬЯ ВОЛНА ПАПКО-ДВИЖА! Напоминаю, что это флешмоб, в рамках которого художники объединяются в папки и всячески помогают друг другу в продвижении (что в нынешние времена ОСОБЕННО важно и нужно!). В прошлых волнах нашего флэшмоба суммарно приняло участие уже больше ПЯТИ ТЫСЯЧ человек, за что ещё раз колоссальное спасибо как самим художникам, так и тем, кто просто решил так или ин

custom 51974494250808319471custom 52312691743905878281

4 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC53 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Продолжаю участвовать в папко-движах! Прошлые мне очень помогли Обожаю этого художника. Собственно, его папка и вдохновила меня на создание своей собственной. Так что если вы в активном поиске аудитории, спешу поделиться! Добавили меня, кстати, вот в эту папку: https://t.me/addlist/bHFk6virUFs4ODcy Ее срок действия ограничен, так что если хотите поддержать товарищей художников, прошу поторопиться ☺️

custom 52312691743905878281custom 54519875351420834461

26 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC234 views41 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 🤩Третья картинка на Артфайт! Моя самая любимая на данный момент. В этот раз месть для моей дорогой мью Polkaraas с:🤩 Спасибо, что тоже атаковала меня! Сразимся ещё раз в следующем году! 😏 Получила невероятное удовольствие от рисования. Во первых, я тащусь от мотыльков (они реально крутецкие!!!!). Во вторых, этот чувак - грех Чревоугодия, если я правильно поняла из его описания. Это мне напомнило Баннику Кончиту и

custom 523544217320531953314custom 523126917439058782812custom 519744942508083194710custom 54519875351420834463🕊1custom 53326978249727959571

21 Jul 2026, 20:50 UTC171 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Думаю, это достойно того, чтоб выложить здесь 💀 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Какое-то время назад я нашла для себя интересный проект по вселенной BATIM – Myth of The Machine. Он настолько меня зацепил, что я решила взяться за перевод всех доступных на данный момент глав (и наконец-то полноценно вернуться в переводы, ееей) Это комикс в стиле FAQ, представляющий собой своеобразный кроссовер между мультяшными персонажами из разных инд

custom 523544217320531953312custom 53326978249727959576custom 54519875351420834465custom 52312691743905878281

19 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC143 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока что я в жёстком отпуске с моим другом Валом. Мы охуенно тусуемся в Питере и недавно были в Тайяки Теперь там висят наши рисуночки 🍌🩶 #порисулька

custom 523544217320531953313custom 52312691743905878288custom 51974494250808319474custom 53326978249727959571

11 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC193 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍂🍄‍🟫🍁 ✨ Вторая атака на артфайт! Продолжаю веселье. В этот раз френдли фаер на Katsu! ✨ Персонажи с таким сложным дизайном для меня всегда одновременно и вызов, и медитация (люблю вырисовывать пятнышки). А ещё у него крутое имя – "Необузданный" Продолжаю осваивать планшет. Давно я так взахлёб не рисовала (9 часов почти без перерывов) 🕯 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ #леновскийарт

🔥15custom 52446002331863122969💘5custom 52312691743905878282🦄1

8 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC178 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @predvestnik_brPhoto

Добивашко Лен

custom 53326978249727959576💘3custom 52446002331863122962

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lensplace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 299,270 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лен||Ежевичная Нора⁶¹ˢᑫᵈ” (@lensplace), 372 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lensplace.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.