Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Соколовская ФМ

@lenasocolfm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

43subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003934644250
TypeChannel
Username@lenasocolfm
DescriptionПредприниматель, мать четверых детей. Бросила вызов: либо в этом году «Волжская улитка» @vylitka становится мощным туристическим проектом региона, либо закрываемся. Подпишись, чтобы следить за тем, как создаётся туристическое место с нуля и без фильтров.
Created30 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lenasocolfm

Growth

436 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:3143no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:4543first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Videos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2346.0%
🔥1734.0%
🥰48.00%
36.00%
❤‍🔥36.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC156 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Есть одна мысль, которая не отпускает меня после фестиваля UpFest в г. Балаково Саратовской области. Мы привыкли думать, что всё самое интересное происходит в столицах. Но всё чаще вижу обратное. Небольшой город Балаково. Каждое лето уже четвертый год он становится местом, куда съезжаются красивые, увлечённые люди со всего Поволжья и не только. Вино, гастрономия, музыка, атмосфера, ради которой хочется возвращаться

8🔥6🥰4

30 Jun 2026, 16:20 UTC35 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Может ли «Волжская улитка» быть не просто ярким и красивым проектом с философией, а стать устойчивым бизнесом, который даёт тот уровень дохода, который соответствует моей жизни и моим целям. Я очень люблю этот проект. Иначе нужно было бы быть мазохистом, чтобы год тянуть то, во что постоянно приходится вкладывать ресурсы. И именно поэтому я не могу смотреть на него только через эмоции. Мы сами себе объявили челленд

🔥432

30 Jun 2026, 15:20 UTC35 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Если бы сегодня я стояла перед выбором открыть ферму улиток — я бы, скорее всего, не открыла. И это не про разочарование. И не про то, что проект не работает. Это про реальность, которая снаружи выглядит намного красивее, чем внутри. Ферма улиток — это действительно эстетичный бизнес. Поля, пространство, еда, атмосфера. Особенно если сравнивать с тем, как это устроено, например, во Франции — там это уже часть культ

7❤‍🔥3🔥3

30 Jun 2026, 15:18 UTC32 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Кажется, пора снова заводить Telegram. Честно, долго сомневалась. Есть запрещенная соцсеть Instagram, есть соцсети «Волжской улитки». Там видно, что происходит: экскурсии, фестивали, новые проекты, партнерства, жизнь фермы. Но в какой-то момент я поняла, что самое интересное всегда остается за кадром. Не сами события. А решения. - Почему из десяти идей выбирается одна. - Почему приходится отказываться от работающи

5🔥41

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @lenasocolfm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 838,782 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Соколовская ФМ” (@lenasocolfm), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenasocolfm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.