Интересно, почему? 🤔
😁8🤣2

Channel
@lenajenkina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,116subscribers
-411 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001726140832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lenajenkina |
| Created | 22 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lenajenkina |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 15,116 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 15,118 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 15,123 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 15,131 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:31 | 15,135 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:31 | 15,146 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 15,150 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:11 | 15,158 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 15,157 | -10 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 21:34 | 15,167 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 15,168 | +12 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 15,156 | -22 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 15,178 | -31 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:20 | 15,209 | -21 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 15,230 | -29 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 15,259 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 15,268 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 15,282 | -23 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 15,305 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 15,315 | first reading |
86 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 86 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,079 reactions across 86 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 2,753 | 34.1% | |
| 🤣 | 1,781 | 22.0% | |
| ❤ | 1,193 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1,002 | 12.4% | |
| 👍 | 442 | 5.47% | |
| 💯 | 380 | 4.70% | |
| 🍾 | 296 | 3.66% | |
| 😱 | 232 | 2.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lenajenkina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 86 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Интересно, почему? 🤔
😁8🤣2
Парнишка, конечно, юн, но зато какие красивые волны! До сих пор не понимаю, как вообще технически возможно там прокатиться, не говоря уже о том, чтобы это ещё и заснять. Вы когда-нибудт сёрфили? Сложно это? выглядит как легкотня))
😁21🔥14❤9
Парочка моих материнских лайфхаков: 1) сначала спрятать и только спустя месяцы выкинуть; 2) проводить ревизию вместе с ребёнком, пусть решает сам; 3) открыть музей. У нас реально есть)) Целая полка с поделками, камнями и прочей хернёй. Всё туда, конечно, не влезает, поэтому иногда проводится смена экспозиции. 4) галерея. Рисунки висят в его комнате на стене, в кухне на стене и в туалете. Иногда проводится смена эксп…
😁87❤7🔥4
я тут нашла тренировки при диастазе, делаю их и думаю: а есть те, у кого после беременности нет диастаза? Как вам это удалось? _ я в максе завела спортивный канал, если вы ненавидите спорт также, как и я - подписывайтесь)) https://max.ru/channel_dolgoletie
❤16💯7
У нас снова случился голомужиковый кризис, они перестали ко мне приходить. И только скакалочный бог никогда не подводит)) Мускулы не сделают тебя счастливой, говорит. Но это, конечно, как сказать. Некоторые мускулы делают меня счастливой более чем)) А ваши как?))
❤49🔥29😁11💯3
Пост для мам с совсем маленькими детьми. Я тут вспомнила, как переживала: — что мой ребёнок мало ест; — что мой ребёнок совсем не ест мясо; — что мой ребёнок не хочет пробовать новую еду; — что мой ребёнок до сих пор в памперсе; — что мой ребёнок плохо разговаривает; — что у моего ребёнка нет друзей в саду. Прошло время, он стал постарше и все эти "проблемы" ушли. Он нормально ест. Он борется за свою долю свиных р…
❤124💯21👍4
Моя называлась бы "Чудо", простигосподи)))))))))) Но я только начала смотреть этот сериал)) не знаю, чего все гонят на Иду Галич, пока она вписывается прям отлично.
😁48❤10🔥2💯1
В августе в контенте для донов вышли посты: 1) Про мой 40-й день рождения (и суши от Иды Галич) 2) Что делать с сединой (мой новый этап) 3) Про мои прекрасные сиськи (фото в цвете) 4) Как мне удалось полюбить Москву после Питера 5) Про свёкров 6) Почему я не хожу к врачам 7) Как я поборола тревожность из-за денег 8) Мой тернистый к богатству по звёздам 9) Игры в приставку в 5 лет Читать по подписке: Вк личная стра…
❤32
Я тут, благодаря комментам, узнала, что есть какие-то прыгалки нового поколения! По сути это только хреновины в руках, а вот этого длинного шнура между ними нет. С такими прыгалками можно дома прыгать, они по полу не стучат. Кто-то тестил? Есть ли в этом вообще смысл? Если не надо перепрыгивать шнур, то, в принципе, можно, наверно, просто прыгать без всего?
👍39🔥24😁17
Никогда не угадаете, почему носок слева - класс, а справа - отстой. (по мнению моего сына)
😁67👍2❤1
Девочки, давайте перетрём. Что мы думаем по этому поводу? К декрету у меня 0 вопросов. Про послеродовую депрессию у мужчин я слышала. Но у меня к ней отношенение как у Линнет из Отчаянных домохозяек. А вы что думаете? Я слишком сурова к мужчинам?
❤18👍2
А кто завтра в школу вообще идёт? как вы?)
😱30🍾14😁9💯5
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @lenajenkina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лена сиси до колена” (@lenajenkina), 15,116 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenajenkina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.