Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

стенгазета Леми

@lemmicosp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

289subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109837351
TypeChannel
Username@lemmicosp
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lemmicosp

Growth

28910 Aug 2026, 07:01 — 289 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:17 — 289 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:0110 Aug 2026, 18:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 288–290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:17289no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:01289first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.1%
avg views ÷ 289 subscribers
Avg views / post
197
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held10 (3 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total590
Reactions total106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

285 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53188452025284798834014.0%
3211.2%
custom 5366192720136123470289.82%
💋289.82%
custom 5357120731299718798258.77%
❤‍🔥248.42%
custom 5366278649546814477196.67%
💘196.67%
custom 5305728952227081266165.61%
😭155.26%
custom 5242347604443933878144.91%
144.91%
🕊103.51%
🔥10.351%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lemmicosp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC117 views57 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026

😀 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 You and me, or "we" When twilight falls and gently embraces us Our hearts burst into joyful bloom We ride the wind to a place beyond time If I'm with you, this love. (karma – alien stage). 😀😀😀 Ada, Emil #lemi_cos

custom 535712073129971879825custom 530572895222708126616custom 524234760444393387814❤‍🔥1🔥1

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

23 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC204 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️💐 прошло больше половины года, поэтому самое время обновить

custom 536619272013612347011custom 53188452025284798838custom 53662786495468144777

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

18 Jul 2026, 04:16 UTC269 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 531884520252847988311custom 53661927201361234705❤‍🔥4custom 53662786495468144773

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

12 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC316 views43 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

привет, выиграли стендом награду эпиккона «лучшая косплей-команда» Фэйсяо анапа 2010 затащили #lemi_cos #lemi_fest

💘15❤‍🔥138custom 53661927201361234707

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

11 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC283 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

эпиккон день 1 все очень плохо, сначала ядерная жара(игра ninah референс), вечером шторм, потоп, макияж умер примерно за час нахождения на фестивале🌟 из приятного мы поели, ну и я люблю своих друзей #lemi_fest

😭15custom 531884520252847988311🕊10custom 536619272013612347031custom 53662786495468144771

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

7 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC264 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026

привет, на днях хочу переделать один старый косплей как думаете кого? 💓

13💋3

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

7 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC211 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @hsrstandPhoto

Внимание-внимание! Астральный Экспресс совершил посадку! 🚂✨ ВК Фест позади, и Пом-Пом спешит подвести итоги. Несмотря на переменчивую погоду, всё прошло просто отлично! Наш стенд был так рад каждому пассажиру и мы надеемся, вам понравилось путешествовать с нами по мирам так же сильно, как Пом-Пом нравится следить за порядком в вагонах. И знаете, что? Мы победили в номинации «Лучший интерактив»! Пом-Пом так гордится

❤‍🔥6💘4💋2custom 53662786495468144772

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

4 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC269 views51 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

сижу на вк фесте 🐹

23💋14custom 53188452025284798838custom 53662786495468144774custom 53661927201361234702

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

3 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC267 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

не теряйте, шеночка нарисовала мне новую автарку у нее чудесные артики @sathira811

💋9custom 53188452025284798832custom 536627864954681447721

Signed 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒊|!| 💥💥

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lemmicosp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 480,925 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“стенгазета Леми” (@lemmicosp), 289 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lemmicosp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.