Channel
@lelecp1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004311074581 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lelecp1 |
| Created | 15 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lelecp1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 13 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 9 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 8 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 8 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (15 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 694 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#空港基地 @6324号飞行员 #乐乐 #欢乐岛 #拱墅 #2026.8#2h 店铺：https://t.me/wangyouge999/94881 颜值8 身材8 皮肤9 敏感度8 性格 9 综合体验8 优点：腿细长， 皮肤光滑白皙，大蟒蛇 缺点：有趣的两广口音不算缺点 过程：好兄弟前几天就推了乐乐，今天正好有空约上了，外派酒店电梯口接到妹妹，一袭粉裙，小白花气质显露无疑，本以为会是轻声细语，害羞的小白花妹妹，没想到一开口有趣的两广口音非常健谈，畅聊半小时后，流畅的卸甲让我看呆了，小荷才露尖尖角，十分粉嫩，让人忍不住去把玩一番，情到深处，吻上小嘴，一条大蟒蛇直接窜了进来，让人猝不及防，在大蟒蛇的辅助下也是顺利出货。 总结：非常有趣的妹妹，小白花的气质但是非常健谈。i人无脑冲。
#空港基地 @0126号飞行员 @yumianshoueliwang66 #欢乐岛 #乐乐 #拱墅 #2026.8#1h 店铺：https://t.me/wangyouge999/87374 颜值9身材9皮肤9敏感度 9性格 9 综合体验9.4 优点：颜值高，性格好，白裙仙气飘飘 缺点：傻白甜，也不算缺点吧 过程：深夜看到乐乐模卡，惊为天人，想到了我的初恋。遂驱车前往，在大厅等了二十分钟，等到妹妹一下来看，惊为天人！人照10分，甚至本人更漂亮！而且有一种天然的亲和力，一袭小白裙，裙摆翩翩。真的，心动了！这二十分钟没白等。 和妹妹进入房间，妹妹帮我铺好床单。搂着我，问我喜欢看什么。“和你一起的话，看什么都行。”妹妹笑靥如花，闻着妹妹的发梢，超级香，香香软软的小蛋糕！破冰了四十分钟，真的不忍心操作了都。 吻上妹妹，香甜的小蛇，调皮地钻入我的口腔，彼此间交互，仿佛灵魂都在彼此交融升华。询问妹妹能否脱衣服，妹妹直爽的卸甲…
#No1727 店铺：#欢乐岛 女仆：#乐乐 💯评分标准 店铺链接: t.me/wangyouge999 店铺资料： t.me/standingmanhz/1288 类型：#邻家妹妹 出击人：#bzg 出击时间：2026.08 环境： B，公寓 人照相似度：人照9 罩杯：胸b 身材：嫩妹身材 身高：165 体重：80 皮肤：雪白 弹性：较弹 平滑度：很滑 态度：A 聊天交流：健谈 敏感处: 熊 抽烟：无 纹身：无 唇钉舌钉：无 吻技：吻技一般 🌱初见 新人第一个钟，给你们测评下，进门看到妹子，就知道这波没踩坑，一身白裙，非常亮眼，这个有着邻家妹妹的感觉，颜值也高，你们来看一眼，就懂了。我估计后面也是个🈵姐。 身材妹子165到168吧，亭亭玉立，很有气质。躺下来趴在我身上聊天，全程不会尴尬，大眼睛看着你。很有女友感。跟妹子多聊了一会，半个小时后才开始办事。 🔥过程 操作上，独留一甲。妹子是真的白啊，…
店铺：https://t.me/wangyouge999 女仆：#乐乐 类型：#邻家妹妹 出击人：#匿名 出击时间：2026.08 环境： B，公寓 人照相似度：人照9 罩杯：胸b 身材：嫩妹身材 身高：165 体重：80 皮肤：雪白 弹性：较弹 平滑度：很滑 态度：A 聊天交流：健谈 敏感处: 熊 抽烟：无 纹身：无 唇钉舌钉：无 吻技：吻技一般 过程：新人第一个钟，给你们测评下，进门看到妹子，就知道这波没踩坑，一身白裙，非常亮眼，这个有着邻家妹妹的感觉，颜值也高，你们来看一眼，就懂了。我估计后面也是个🈵️姐。 身材妹子165到168吧，亭亭玉立，很有气质。躺下来趴在我身上聊天，全程不会尴尬，大眼睛看着你。很有女友感。跟妹子多聊了一会，半个小时后才开始办事。 操作上，独留一甲。妹子是真的白啊，可太白了。年纪比较小，嫩妹身材，没赘肉。这个我是真喜欢。细节上，就不多说了，熊比较铭感，其他的都是正常操作，无压力，上下都可以。但…
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @lelecp1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“乐乐测评” (@lelecp1), 13 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lelecp1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.