Channel
@bushendaquan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,529subscribers
+444 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002696816529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bushendaquan |
| Created | Between 1 April 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bushendaquan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 2,529 | +12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 2,517 | +293 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 2,224 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 2,224 | +139 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 2,085 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,151 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#空港基地 @0126号飞行员 @yumianshoueliwang66 #童话镇 #纯纯 #拱墅 #2026.8#1h 店铺：https://t.me/tonghuazhen_xiaofeifei/23119 颜值7身材8皮肤 8敏感度 9性格 9 综合体验8.5 优点：情绪价值拉满，水润多汁 缺点：人照有点差异 过程： 首先夸一下客服小呆呆，沟通很及时，态度超级好。 约了纯纯，进入房间，妹妹在床上小憩，看得出来很疲惫，客服说醒醒，客人来啦，妹妹就一下子起来了，没有什么起床气。态度很好，一开始我没进入状态，一直盯着投影，柳下惠，目不转睛。妹妹俏皮的脸贴着我的脸，说怎么不看我哥哥，是我不好看吗。我动心忍性。妹妹便把脸凑到我面前，我玩心大起，故意歪过头，去看手机。妹妹气鼓鼓的，假装生气。说哥哥你点我是来看电影的吗。我说是的，我说你要不睡会觉。妹妹说我不睡，这点态度还是很好的。 大约半小时后，我说，妹妹我要切换恶魔形态了，…
#空港基地 @0126号飞行员 #kitty岛 #小念 #拱墅 #2026.8#2h 店铺：https://t.me/hello_kittynvpuguan/38154 颜值8.8身材8.8皮肤 8.8敏感度 9.0性格 9.5 综合体验8.5 优点：清纯青春，漂亮，真诚，身材也好 缺点：可能太熟了，有点摸鱼 过程： 拿到了kitty岛的二免一，果断选择了小念，点的双钟外派，妹妹也按时到达～穿了我觉得最适合她的jk装。一上来，我俩都比较羞涩，妹妹害羞地脱掉鞋子袜子，露出了芊芊玉足。然后一上床就让关灯，害羞地我都不好意思了。因为第二次和妹妹相见，少去了破冰流程。妹妹一上来就和我分享了最近发生的事情，叽叽喳喳，像一只小黄雀。我也耐心的在一旁听着，时不时分享一下自己的观点。 时间流逝，四十分钟以后，我只能坏坏地堵住妹妹不愿意停息的小嘴～嘿嘿，还是一如既往的，亲嘴笨蛋。每次妹妹们的衣服就像各种暗藏机关的密室。慢慢摸索，才能…
浮光跃金 pinned a photo
🎰 泡泡屋女仆开业大吉 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-杭州泡泡屋女仆私影 🎫 加入-浮光跃金 🎫 加入-武林女仆集注 🎫 加入-武林女仆杂货店 🎫 加入-空港基地 🎫 加入-空港基地女仆巡航编队 🎁 奖品内容: 二免一800优惠券（测评返现） × 1 双钟200优惠券 × 2 单钟100优惠券 × 3 50口令红包 × 4 💡 活动说明: 💡 活动说明: 🥷优惠券与别的优惠不叠加。 🥷开奖后，有效期7天。 🥷大额优惠，先原价测评返现 🥷最终解释权归商家所有 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月08日 20时08分08秒
浮光跃金 pinned Deleted message
#空港基地 @0126号飞行员 #翻斗花园 #Neko #上城 #2026.8#1h 店铺：https://t.me/fandouhuayuan_jlq/7326?single 颜值8.9身材8.8皮肤 8.9敏感度 9.0性格 9.0 综合体验9 优点：一眼心动，情绪价值和颜值齐飞 缺点：稍微有点慢热 过程： 看店长说来了顶美中班，必须得来看一看了。一进店，妹妹回眸对我一笑。我就知道，来对了！来对了！！真的是一眼心动，跟着妹妹进了房间。参考到是新人，我就自己打开了话匣子，妹妹句句有回应，这点令人很舒服。和我一样喜欢动漫，喜欢看龙傲天哈哈，破冰破了四十分钟吧，因为是中班，不敢太过分。我试探性问问，能不能亲你。她俏皮的问，可以吖，你要亲哪里呀～我嘿嘿一笑，啄了一下她的小脸。眉眼弯弯，我仿佛看到了斑驳柳叶中间的那一轮明月，悬在天际，照亮了我玩女仆的初心。我试探性把手覆盖在妹妹的胸间，像个新兵蛋子，纯爱的问，我可以捏捏她，亲…
浮光跃金 pinned Deleted message
浮光跃金 pinned Deleted message
#空港基地 @0126号飞行员 #欢乐岛 #海棠 #拱墅 #2026.7#1h 店铺：https://t.me/wangyouge999/74114?single 颜值8.4身材8.5皮肤 8.5敏感度 9.5性格 9.0 综合体验8.9 优点：真人很有气质，性格很好，很juicy 缺点：作为一个新人，没明显缺点 过程： 欢乐岛上了个新人，问了哈密，人照几分，哈密说真人比模卡还好看，我直接一个冲锋，抵达店铺～妹妹像个小白花，坐在沙发上，腰背挺得笔直。能感觉到她第一次来店里，紧张，但又有点可爱。 领着妹妹进房间，真的纯素人。。。但也主动递了水，我教她用漱口水，然后抱着上了床。香喷喷的，对视一个大蟒蛇～直接把妹妹亲眩晕了，眼神迷离。。。太可爱了吧！ 随即让妹妹脱下上衣，妹妹说是这样的吗，我说这是最基本的操作了～妹妹慢慢褪下外衣，别有一番风情。露出了一对酥胸，基底有点硬，但上面是软的，但又不是假胸，但亲着，很舒服，粉粉嫩…
#空港基地 @0126号飞行员 #甜屿 #七月 #拱墅 #2026.7#1h 店铺：https://t.me/lunazhizhenmeng/3517 颜值8.5身材8.5皮肤 8.5敏感度 9.0性格 8.7 综合体验8.7 优点：模卡无差，敏感活虾，胸手感很好 缺点：舌头太短，不是大蟒蛇 过程： 久闻大名，之前在另一家店都约不大上。这次复出，终于能约上了。进去妹妹在补妆，敬业态度拉满。本人和模卡一模一样！金发衬托的皮肤很白净！ 和妹妹常规破冰以后，就是一个大蟒蛇，妹妹猝不及防～卸上甲很顺利。吮吸🐻的时候，妹妹都会一直抖动，像极了活虾。全身都超级敏感。随即一路向下，妹妹穿了一条很有心机的黑色蕾丝内裤，令人血脉喷张！ 可惜再往里探，被妹妹阻止了。没辙，满姐什么招式没试过，我18般武艺都施展了一遍，妹妹都是微笑着摇头。好嘛，最后在玩弄乳头和聊天中结束了这一钟。中间小插曲，妹妹说她是08年的，今年刚18岁，我真不信，结果…
#空港基地 @0126号飞行员 #kitty岛 #小念 #拱墅 #2026.7#1h 店铺：https://t.me/hello_kittynvpuguan/38154 颜值8.8身材8.8皮肤 8.8敏感度 9.0性格 9.5 综合体验9.4 优点：清纯青春，漂亮，真诚，身材也好 缺点：没找到适合自己的穿搭 过程： 听说来了T1颜值妹妹，直接一手螺旋冲锋，高铁党直达kitty岛。一开始客服以为我约了另一个好妹妹，我还在纳闷，结果一问，大厅那个颜值身材具备的妹妹，就是小念！ 直接进房间，一开始妹妹和我都有点拘谨，妹妹刚开始当女仆，我呢，看到漂亮妹妹就开始拘束呜呜呜。一把揽过妹妹，妹妹小手特别冰凉，啥都别说了，直接给妹妹把脉！上热下寒，不对，滑脉！呜呜，难道妹妹来大姨妈了！一摸，果然。那就切换成了恋爱模式～妹妹叽叽喳喳的，像只可爱的小黄雀～拿着手机，跟我分享这分享那。真的让我梦回初恋，分享欲，是情侣最重要的一部分！ 聊…
浮光跃金 pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bushendaquan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 156,844 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“浮光跃金” (@bushendaquan), 2,529 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bushendaquan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.