Channel
@lelanberg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
304subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001708947484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lelanberg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lelanberg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 304 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 307 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 310 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 309 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 309 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
391 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5469626995891513302 | 117 | 29.9% | |
| custom 5325551635047390647 | 107 | 27.4% | |
| custom 5325527518806024095 | 99 | 25.3% | |
| custom 5458694341323136053 | 44 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5345930503247638270 | 20 | 5.12% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.02% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 391reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lelanberg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 October 2025 to 17 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Чем прекрасно яркое окрашивание - так это вариативностью ⠀ Можно как и постоянно экспериментировать с разнообразными цветовыми решениями, так и выбрать один любый стойкий цвет и поддерживать окрашивание им ⠀ Самое главное, грамотно подбирать краситель под нужную задачу 😋
custom 532552751880602409516custom 54586943413231360534custom 53255516350473906472
Коррекция аиртача спустя почти 2 года 😱 В такой коррекции есть нюансы и приходиться вальсировать между чистым цветом на кончиках и качеством волос, так как к сожалению за такое длительное время слои как ни крути перемешаются частично или даже полностью И есть выбор, либо безжалостно осветлять все кончики повторно, чтобы добиться чистого результата, но потерять в качестве волос (что может привести к обламыванию) Ли…
custom 546962699589151330213custom 53255275188060240952
Я так много красила в красный, что в 2024 году (в 25 я думаю было бы тоже самое, но на этот новогоднем карпоративе не было подсчетов 😅) больше всех потратила красного красителя Не удержалась и сама попросила Иру покрасить меня в этот роскошный цвет 🥰
custom 546962699589151330225custom 53255516350473906479custom 54586943413231360535
❤️
custom 53255275188060240952
Уже почти два года (!) я хожу красить волосы к Лере в студию hair positive и это одно из лучших решений моей жизни. Перед всеми самыми важными событиями я доверяю свои волосы Лере. И студия супер комфортная и удобно расположена Люблю уважаю ✨
custom 532555163504739064724custom 54586943413231360538custom 53255275188060240955💯2
С такой красивой работой можно и не один пост сделать 🥰 ⠀
custom 532552751880602409527custom 53255516350473906476custom 54696269958915133022💯1custom 54586943413231360531
Хочу здесь кучу реакций с радужными сердечками! 🥰
custom 546962699589151330277custom 532555163504739064719custom 53459305032476382709custom 54586943413231360532💯1
Лера | Яркое окрашивание в Москве 🌈 | Цветные волосы pinned a photo
Обожаю градиенты❤️ Особенно на планшете, хихи
custom 532552751880602409521custom 532555163504739064714
Самое приятное, что с таким окрашиванием даже спустя время волосы смотрятся красиво 😋 ⠀
custom 532555163504739064732custom 54586943413231360539custom 53255275188060240954
Покрасила @ireine_i без кринж-видео не обошлось
custom 532552751880602409522custom 545869434132313605315custom 534593050324763827011custom 53255516350473906471
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @lelanberg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лера | Яркое окрашивание в Москве 🌈 | Цветные волосы” (@lelanberg), 304 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lelanberg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.