Dls 2025 kubok turnirlari pinned a photo

Channel
Dls 2025 kubok turnirlari
@legendalarrrr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002379393791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @legendalarrrr |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/legendalarrrr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 13 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 10 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 11 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Akaund sotiladi Holati zor 100 foiz ishonchli Narxi 950 ming Murojat uchun @Bobur05210
Katta kanalga otib ovoz beramiz go
❤1
Kim galaba qozonadi
- Bobur76%
- Elmator24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Kim galaba qozonadi
- Bobur 😈65%
- Arabtili jannat tili 😈35%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Bu turnir juda katta turnir boladi kattaligiga yarasha priz ham zor boladi ushani uchun yaxshilab ovoz beramiz
- 5 vs 5 jamoaviy turnir40%
- Superliga kamanda tanlab uzb boyicha13%
- Yevropa chempionlar ligasi eski formatdagi korinishda turnir gurux bosqichki yani27%
- 1 talik oyin oyinchikar soni cheklanmagan20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1👍1
Kanalga otib ovozni ayamaymiz go
🙌 ASSALOMU ALAYKUM, BARCHAGA! 🙌 ☠ TURNIR YANA STARTDA! 👨✈️ SEZON 2 rasman boshlanmoqda! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚜ TURNIR: SEZON 2 ⚜ 🔰 Rasmiy start berildi! 🪑 Ishtirokchilar soni: 128 ta o‘rin mavjud 🏆 SOVRINLAR: • 🥇 1-o‘rin — 200 000 so‘m • 🥈 2-o‘rin — 100 000 so‘m • 🥉 3-o‘rin — ful aralash sariq akkaunti ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🪪 Homiy: @joxongir0034 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📍 Turnir mana shu kanal orqali o‘tkaziladi: ✅ Turnir kan…
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
Signed Nj17🖤
Assalom aleykum hammaga akalar turnirni hech kim oynamay qoydi menimcha shu yerda tugatsak nima deysizlar
Laliga qilamiz hamma kamanda tanlasin shu postni tagiga 1 Real @Neymarr_r 2 ososuna @Khol1_kov1 3 benfika @maxsetov04 4 Psj @boriyy7777 5 betis @rashidov_math 6 Barselona @KELDIYAROB 7 sevilliya @Armonim_2107 8 atletiko madrid @Aiddhii 9 legenes @Ibrokhimov_2311 10 valensiya @ispanya1 11 Validolid @Uzbek_ZC 12 selta @King_dls12 13 alaves @Bobur05210 14 getafe @JISHDLS 15 mollorca
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @legendalarrrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Kim galaba qozonadi
- Bobur76%
- Elmator24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Kim galaba qozonadi
- Bobur 😈65%
- Arabtili jannat tili 😈35%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Bu turnir juda katta turnir boladi kattaligiga yarasha priz ham zor boladi ushani uchun yaxshilab ovoz beramiz
- 5 vs 5 jamoaviy turnir40%
- Superliga kamanda tanlab uzb boyicha13%
- Yevropa chempionlar ligasi eski formatdagi korinishda turnir gurux bosqichki yani27%
- 1 talik oyin oyinchikar soni cheklanmagan20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 11 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@legendalarrrr named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dls 2025 kubok turnirlari” (@legendalarrrr), 13 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legendalarrrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.