πΌALL HACKING & PDF'S π§Έ https://t.me/legacyxbooks
π₯1π€―1π1

Channel
@legacyxcourse
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
411subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003956375367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @legacyxcourse |
| Description | π Disclaimer: This group is strictly for educational purposes only. We do not provide or support any illegal activities. Any discussions or resources shared here are meant for learning and ethical use only. Members are responsible for their own actions. |
| Created | 11 April 2026 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/legacyxcourse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 411 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 411 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (11 April 2026 β 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,431 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
119 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 28 | 23.5% | |
| β‘ | 22 | 18.5% | |
| π€― | 22 | 18.5% | |
| π | 13 | 10.9% | |
| π | 12 | 10.1% | |
| π | 11 | 9.24% | |
| πΎ | 4 | 3.36% | |
| β€ | 2 | 1.68% | |
| π | 2 | 1.68% | |
| π€ | 2 | 1.68% | |
| π«‘ | 1 | 0.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @legacyxcourse. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 April 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
πΌALL HACKING & PDF'S π§Έ https://t.me/legacyxbooks
π₯1π€―1π1
HERE IS YOUR GIFT π LEGACYCOURSE.IN https://legacycourse.in/blogs/osint-tools-for-the-dark-web https://legacycourse.in/blogs/google-hacking-tools https://legacycourse.in/blogs/hacking-myths https://legacycourse.in/blogs/30-tips-how-to-use-osint-for-bug-hunting https://legacycourse.in/blogs/price-tampering-free-shopping https://legacycourse.in/blogs/github-repositories-for-oscp-prepration https://legacycourse.β¦
π€―3π₯2π1
π9000TB+ RESCOURSES FOR YOU GUY'S ONLY SUPPORT WE GUY'S WE PROVIDE YOU GOOD & PREMIUM RESCOURSES ONLY FOR YOU GUY'S π«Ά IF YOU THINK IT'S HELPFUL TO YOU PLEASE SHARE TO OTHER'S https://legacycourse.in/blogs/9000tb-bundle-edition
π₯3
πͺ MILITARY OSINT COURSE β THINK LIKE AN INTELLIGENCE ANALYST π°οΈ Want to master Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) at a military & tactical level? This course is designed for those who want to go beyond basic OSINT and learn how real intelligence is gathered, analyzed, and operationalized. π What Youβll Learn: β Military-grade OSINT methodologies β Tracking military movements & assets using open sources β Geolocation,β¦
π₯4
π³ UHQ DEEPSEEK JAILBREAK β Prompt Here: Click Me
β‘3π€―2π1
https://t.me/+egohmZweqPk5ZDY9
π₯2π€―2π1
https://youtu.be/-CuNh6stlAQ?si=TYK1T__0qFjzxhSS
π₯1
πHELLO GUYS SHOUD WE COMEBACK AGAIN' START EVERYTHING FROM THE π«₯BEGINNING GIVE REACTIONS BOYSπ
π€―9π₯4β‘2πΎ2π€2π1π«‘1π1
File, posted without a caption
Top 5 Tools & Techniques for Penetration Testing Password: @certs_help https://t.me/legacyxcourse
π€―2
Complete Introduction to Cybersecurity 2026 π2.5 hours on-demand video π2 articles π1 downloadable resource πAccess on mobile and TV βοΈFull lifetime access ο»Ώ πPASSWORD π:legacyxudemy DOWNLOAD HERE :βοΈ https://t.me/+-Pd3FfumkehmYzI9
β‘17π13π11π₯9π6πΎ2π€―1
β οΈBLACK HAT HACKING (BHH) Dear Hacker, Your path to the dark side of the web begins now. This isnβt just a course β itβs a weapon. Designed for those who dare to go beyond boundaries β for knowledge, for power, for security. π₯ What Youβll Unlock:- πΆ Broadband Internet Hacking π₯ Hunting Breached Passwords β£οΈ Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) β¨οΈ Browser Exploitation Framework (BeEF)π² Social Engineering & Phishing Attaβ¦
π€―2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @legacyxcourse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππππππππππβ’β (@legacyxcourse), 411 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legacyxcourse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.