Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЗВН.

@leftright_shitpost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002421971897
TypeChannel
Username@leftright_shitpost
DescriptionЧеловек творящий
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/leftright_shitpost

Growth

1537 Aug 2026, 14:10 — 153 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:16 — 153 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:108 Aug 2026, 19:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:16153no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:10153first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.1%
avg views ÷ 153 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 March 202621 July 2026)
Views total43
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
581
Videos
58
Links
114

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1521.1%
🥰1419.7%
🤡1014.1%
💊811.3%
🕊811.3%
👎45.63%
🤩45.63%
🍌34.23%
👌34.23%
🐳22.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC77 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Одинокий столб фонарный под дождём всегда стоит. Все идут, а он грустит. Освещает путь чужим, потому что свой претит. Андрей Шкотский

🥰5🐳1

8 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC81 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Публикую стих друга по его просьбе Я иду по полю боя, Где победа на ветру, Там, где красные озёра Вновь уходят в тишину; Где тела вражин народа, Среди тел моего дома, Утопают в землях топких, В камнях и травах мокрых – От крови алой и густой. Рассвет над полем этим мёртвым. И не понять теперь мне радости другой, Чем солнце, восходящее над нами, Чем все кричащие гортани: "Мы победили!", "Враг повержен!", "Град удер

👍7

4 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC130 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Плетём любопытные сети. Нам нужно стараться эти Всегда любопытные сети Заставить работать на нас. Играем в хорошие руки. Нам нужно постичь все муки, Что эти хорошие руки Всегда вызывают для нас. Мечтаем о праведных стенах. Но эти лютые стены, Что старым готовят замену, Совсем хороши уж для нас. Поэтому наши мечтанья, Особенно наши страданья, А также все эти стенанья Даны свыше кем-то для нас, А значит — нам нужно

👍4🍌1

4 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026

Бля, сплошная хуйня какая-то, всё сразу как снег на голову, да что ж такое-то нахуй.

4 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTCviews —

ЗВН. pinned «Ёбаные пчёлы (или осы, хуй их разберёт).»

4 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ёбаные пчёлы (или осы, хуй их разберёт).

28 Jun 2026, 20:44 UTC92 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пусть прочь пропадёт мир немого стыда, Пусть сгинут в холодном огне города И спустится с неба разгневанный бог И взглядом стеклянным на тысячу миль Посмотрит на нас и заплачет.

👌3👎1

17 Jun 2026, 10:19 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

По-моему уже все должны бы понять, кто такой Трамп, и что в западный клуб нас не примут. Какой-то отвратительный карго культ у нас. Мол, щас подлижем, где-нибудь срежем углы, и нас Америка полюбит (нет). Раньше хотя бы смешно было наблюдать за этим, а сейчас сплошная тоска

🕊3

10 Jun 2026, 20:34 UTC140 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И словно война не закончилась, И словно прокипела вода, И словно с великою стойкостью Мы ходили оттуда сюда; И мясо постигло своей стороны, И небо охрипло от всей доброты, И стало нас — стало — нестало застало.

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @leftright_shitpost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 953,567 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗВН.” (@leftright_shitpost), 153 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leftright_shitpost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.