Channel
@leer52011
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
265subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002175254752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leer52011 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leer52011 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 265 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 266 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 268 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 266 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (22 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 10 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
樂兒外送茶月底兩天限定優惠 生客首次約妹送1k 優惠劵 4k內 一次性三節 送 原味內衣褲一套 可指定 包夜滿6H 送 飛機杯一套 情趣衣 兔女郎一套 伴遊3小時 以上活動均不限定價位 有約就有送 優惠名額限定10個 聯絡方式 TG ：@qi5720 聯絡方式 賴：tt76720 聯絡方式Gleezy：Leer6688 活動時間 7-30號-8-1號凌晨01點結束
https://t.me/+qjHvvkycxlgyNTFh 進入VIP 頻道的哥哥 要珍惜喲 VIP 頻道 從今天開始 加入全部要審覈喲 因都是妹的本人照片 以及VIP 才能享受福利 所以之後都會開啓審覈模式喲😀
#求助篇 #求助篇 #求助篇 #求助篇 婷婷 是鄰居家阿嬤的孫女 跟男友分手之後才發現自己懷孕了 善良的她不想傷害一個無辜的生命 所以選擇生下這個可愛的小生命 猶豫阿嬤生病 也花光了工作餘下的錢 生活以成了負擔 #才第一時間選擇了下海兼職 賺取阿嬤的護理費 哥哥們都幫幫這個單親媽媽好嗎 樂兒真的是一分錢都沒有在賺 可以私密樂兒：喬約會時間 喬服務 喬價位 @qi5720 🌐樂兒預約賴： tt76720 🌐樂兒預約TG：@qi5720 ⭐樂兒的Gleezy ID：Leer6688 🌐樂兒獨家論壇：http://www.tvswj.com/ ⭐福利群：https://c.gleezy.top/Zb3z07GS ☺️☺️☺️ 一鍵加入樂兒所有頻道 ⏰樂兒淫液時間：上午10:00—-凌晨01:00
#初次下海 #早教老師 喬希 166cmC奶 28歲 47kg 這個老師 是樂兒客人家孩子的早教老師 因為家裏的原因 急需要錢 才願意出來兼職 沒有結婚 有一個男朋友 男朋友是軟飯男 有暴力傾向 一直在分手中 女生是高知識人員 照片也是客人哥哥從監視器裏面截圖出來的 有喜歡老師的哥哥 要速度約一下喲 @qi5720
https://t.me/leer1689 每日都在更新上百部中喲
https://t.me/leer1689
#新竹客評 👉點它看資訊 她好像是做廣告拍攝的 有聽她提過一嘴 只是兼職在做拍攝廣告 是剛畢業的大學生 很清純 是敏感的 很主動 在新竹真的很少見到這麽棒的女生 她口交很厲害 舌吻很會挑逗 會把你心裏弄的癢癢的 這次的妹妹很讚 安排很不錯 下次在找你 🌐樂兒預約賴： tt76720 🌐樂兒預約TG：@qi5720 ⭐樂兒的Gleezy ID：Leer6688 🌐樂兒獨家論壇：http://www.tvswj.com/ ⭐福利群：https://c.gleezy.top/Zb3z07GS ☺️☺️☺️ 一鍵加入樂兒所有頻道 ⏰樂兒淫液時間：下午10:00—-凌晨01:00
❤1
🚨 樂兒防詐騙重要公告 #必須看玩 🚨 #必須看完 #必須看完 #必須看完 約妹認準樂兒本人經營的賬號👇 🌐樂兒預約賴： tt76720 🌐樂兒預約TG：@qi5720 ⭐樂兒的Gleezy ID：Leer6688 🌐樂兒獨家論壇：http://www.tvswj.com/ ⭐福利群：https://c.gleezy.top/Zb3z07GS ☺️☺️☺️ 一鍵加入樂兒所有頻道 ⏰樂兒淫液時間：下午10:00—-凌晨01:00 近期網路詐騙案件頻傳， 許多不法人士冒用茶莊名稱、 盜用照片、仿冒客服帳號，甚至假借 「訂金」、「保證金」、「認證費」、「點數」、「開通會員」等名義騙取金錢來都詐騙 為保障每位客人不被詐騙到金錢和個人財產 約妹妹前請務必認明是 #樂兒 本人於你聯絡， 避免受騙。 📢 樂兒茶莊交易原則 ✅ 約旅館永遠採用 見面滿意，現金消費。 ✅ 無需任何訂金、保證金或預付款。 ✅ 不販售任何點數、…
#臺中西屯 名字：朵茉行館 價位：休息【1080】2h 地址：台中市西屯區龍德路二段520號 電話： 04 2259 5588 🌐樂兒的賴： zz886600 🌐樂兒的TG：@qi5720 ⭐樂兒的Gleezy ID：Leer6688 🌐樂兒獨家論壇： http://www.tvswj.com ☺️☺️☺️ 一鍵加入樂兒所有頻道 ➡️感謝大哥的實拍 玩開心喲 ⬅️感謝哥哥
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @leer52011. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,422,952 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“樂兒推薦旅館” (@leer52011), 265 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leer52011.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.