Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Https://t.melee/0313

@lee0313

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

405subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355598889
TypeChannel
Username@lee0313
DescriptionPatriot, Constitutionalist, Trump is my President. Trump 2024🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 🟥 MAGA 🟥MAHA🟥DOGE🟥 Anything I post is not necessarily my opinion Anything I repost is not an endorsement of the repost https://telegra.ph/Legal-Disclaimer-05-26
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lee0313

Growth

4057 Aug 2026, 01:08 — 405 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:18 — 405 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:087 Aug 2026, 01:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 404–406 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:18405no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:08405first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.90%
avg views ÷ 405 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total223
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
87,700
Videos
48,100
Links
83,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
13.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
12.0
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeforeOurTimeVideo

The most dangerous 77 seconds ever recorded by a psychiatrist just broke containment again. Thomas Szasz, the man the entire profession tried to erase, looked straight into the camera and said: “We do not have an epidemic of mental illness. We have an epidemic of psychiatry.” Too fat → illness Too thin → illness Too happy, too sad, too much sex, too little sex → all illnesses No free will, no responsibility left

Signed David

7 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RaheemKassam

NEW: DOJ Denied Access to D.C. Voter Rolls by Obama Judge. https://thenationalpulse.com/2026/08/06/doj-denied-access-to-d-c-voter-rolls-by-obama-judge/?feed_id=99147&_unique_id=6a751bcca7a55

6 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC14 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @disclosetvVideo

NOW - Stephen Miller says Trump's newly signed executive order will ban foreign nationals from lobbying and taking advantage of the U.S., it also "banned" birth tourism. @disclosetv

6 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC15 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inmagnaexcitatioVideo

President Trump Calls on the DOJ to Prosecute Dr. Fauci for His Actions - 08/06/26 https://gab.com/RSBNetwork/posts/117050464718748948

6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @drue86Photo

We are less than 2 days away from the massive peak of the Lions Gate Energy Portal, and less than a week from our next Solar Eclipse — and the Higher Energy has been relentless! ⚡️😮‍💨⚡️ How you experience this quantum simulation we call "reality" depends on your belief system, the condition of your physical vessel, energy alignment, frequency, and how much fuel is in the tank. When you hold the highest belief system

Signed David

6 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC12 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cosmicvibezVideo

😂 ✨🦋 ➠ @cosmicvibez⚡️ 📌BOOST 💘 📌Donate 📌Place ur Ads in this channel

Signed David

6 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC12 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thedailyrabbitVideo

the diamond princess of 6G... trump is planning to roll out 6G at warp speed... are you ready for the new PLANDEMIC ?? 🔗 THE WHITE RABBIT 👁 (t.me/thedailyrabbit)

Signed David

6 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC14 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BennyJohnsonVideo

Rand Paul after the Vote to Hold Fauci in Contempt of Congress: “We will hand carry this over to the Attorney General. We will hand carry this to the District Court here in Columbia.” This confirms what he told us exclusively last week:

6 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026
AdvertisementForwarded from @police_frequencyVideo

#ad 1969 Ferrari 365 GT 2+2 😎 https://www.beverlyhillscarclub.com @police_frequency

6 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://apple.news/AGQ7P966kQcmqBq_DJan7sg

🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lee0313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Https://t.melee/0313” (@lee0313), 405 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lee0313.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.