Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SuckAI

Channel

SuckAI

@lechu2222gwei

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

974subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001711885227
TypeChannel
Username@lechu2222gwei
Description2222 гвей
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lechu2222gwei

Growth

9747 Aug 2026, 12:07 — 974 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:46 — 974 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:078 Aug 2026, 00:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 973–975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 00:46974no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:07974first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
152
Videos
3
Links
181

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2821.7%
🏆2519.4%
🤯2317.8%
🤝1612.4%
😭1410.9%
🙉75.43%
🔥43.10%
🤔43.10%
custom 544313981231801153732.33%
🤬32.33%
🗿10.775%
😎10.775%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 9 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lechu2222gwei. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 October 2025 to 9 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Dec 2025, 15:04 UTC≈4,310 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Вернули деньги -20к Даже ачивку не дали уроды

😭14🗿1😎1

8 Dec 2025, 10:57 UTC≈4,100 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Перевод Мы ввели меры против ботов Все что мы сделали: - набрили ботеров и не отдаем им деньги - Сделали капу меньше чтобы даже безрукие ботеры имели чуть больше шансов - наш сейл снова оттарабанят черенком https://x.com/jupiterexchange/status/1997969413601972695?s=46&t=0FrGmk1ARVrcdeQwrFo1xQ

🤯12🙉43

5 Dec 2025, 15:14 UTC≈3,030 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ramar9

https://x.com/ramarxyz/status/1996940376591007918 друзья, почему у вас забрали 1.2кк с паблик сейла, которые вы могли бы занести??? https://solscan.io/account/4Xgt6XKZiowAGNdPWngVAwpYbSwAmbBnRBPtCFXhrypc?exclude_amount_zero=true&remove_spam=true&value=15000&value=21000&token_address=EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v#transfers

🤔4

5 Dec 2025, 11:32 UTC≈2,980 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Юпитер обещает FCFS ICO. Обещают без релаунча. Не делают ни единой попытки защиты. Их очевидно ботят так же как это происходит уже лет 8 в крипте без исключений. Переобуваются после того как их сботили по всем правилам FCFS ICO. Humidifi чето высирает про то, что они «едят ботов» Баблмапс занимается анализом кошельков несколько лет и делает вывод о том, что все 1500 кошельков были Рамара ТОЛЬКО потому что они в

8

5 Dec 2025, 10:57 UTC≈1,870 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я хз как это комментировать На 3 конторы ни одного человека, которого не били в детстве в Индии палками по голове https://x.com/bubblemaps/status/1996891901207949786

2

4 Dec 2025, 15:09 UTC≈1,750 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

https://www.tensor.trade/trade/vision_node Всем неверующим в вижен ноду соболезную

🔥4🤝2

3 Dec 2025, 18:00 UTC≈1,570 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ставлю FWOG FCFS https://opensea.io/collection/fwogs/overview @Sacai_eth

6

2 Dec 2025, 18:36 UTC≈1,390 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

WET WL скорее всего будет модуль, пишите в дм за слотами На паблик не пишите @Sacai_eth

🏆4

11 Nov 2025, 18:04 UTC≈1,920 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

фулл хит всем около ~200 в сумме за все стадии

🏆75

11 Nov 2025, 12:18 UTC≈1,570 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ставлю wallchain Лучший саксесрейт на солане https://magiceden.io/launchpad/solana/wallchain В дм с фазой @Sacai_eth

🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lechu2222gwei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 536,007 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SuckAI” (@lechu2222gwei), 974 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lechu2222gwei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.